Alteration vs. Conservation Defined

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

I also would be curious about this. I'd guess the majority of cards deserving of stickers were doctored...and following the stickers is a roadmap to many doctored cards.

But according to PWCC's post on Blowout, Brent has no idea whose cards they are when he assigns the stickers. Although someone traced one or more submissions and showed a high percentage of cards from the same submission getting stickered. Who knows.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

But according to PWCC's post on Blowout, Brent has no idea whose cards they are when he assigns the stickers. Although someone traced one or more submissions and showed a high percentage of cards from the same submission getting stickered. Who knows.

I really don't believe anything brent could possibly say at this time.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

I really don't believe anything brent could possibly say at this time.

Some of us still do, apparently.

For me it feels like the Aesop's fable.

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

But according to PWCC's post on Blowout, Brent has no idea whose cards they are when he assigns the stickers. Although someone traced one or more submissions and showed a high percentage of cards from the same submission getting stickered. Who knows.

A blind fold could be employed to assure the randomness of the sticker selection process reminiscent of a game many of us played as kids.

Donkey.jpeg

Or is the sticker selection process dependent on the name of the "donkey"?