|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd keep it. Looks accurately graded assuming it's not altered and has nice eye appeal for the grade.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Huh? Did he buy this one and not alter it. That would be interesting.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It displays very nice for a 1.5 grade. I think the altering could have been soaking perhaps.
I am so bamboozled on what to do with the card... and so angry that someone has ruined the hobby i love. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess I should have said trimmed and not altered. Not really seeing an issue with a possible soak. How many times have members posted threads on the board asking for help on how to soak?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
He apparently uses a chemical bath -- not water -- and it affects the integrity of the cardboard and often seems to lighten the ink on the back. Would be nice to see the before, but I'm sure the guys over at BO would've found it when they were able to find the other two. Maybe it's still on its way...
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Using anything other than water to soak a card is VERY bad. The paper can turn brittle down the line and start breaking. I would send it back.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe PSA would assign this a "Pedigree flip" like the Lionel Carter Collection ones, but this one could say "Gary Moser Un-altered". |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Between how short the 3 is and the fact SGC only gave it an A, I would look to review it if you can't return it. And I would look to SGC. The problem with PSA review is that if they missed something once it's likely to happen twice, and they have financial incentive to bless it again.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-04-2019 at 11:33 PM. |
![]() |
|
|