![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Campanella variant was included in the Huggins and Scott Super set a few years back. The checklist is in post 6
https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr9...2ULPJ6hPHVjo0- Getting 2 of that card and the two Mantles, Thompsons and Robinsons was expensive ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 06-06-2019 at 07:26 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are a couple rare variations I picked up recently. If I was bidding against one of you for the Papai, Apologize.
On the Papai (#245), there is a blue slash along the bottom of the leftmost version. FYI, these are both the "no copyright" versions. On the Frisch (#229), there is a little blue dash in the lower right margin of the right example. This is the common version so the left example, without the blue dash, is the variation and very rare, I am told. FYI, these are both the "copyright" versions. I will soon also have another example showing a variation in the the sixth series of this set, so stayed tuned! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it was the graded Papai auction on ebay I followed it and in the end was glad I stayed on the sideline
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was informed about a variation in the sixth (of seven) series of the 1950 Bowman Baseball set. Everyone is familiar with the last two series having been issued initially without the copyright at the bottom and then this was corrected in both sets. The bottom of these two scans shows the no copyright version. The middle version of the Hamner and top of the Stringer shows what is likely the first correction with the copyright being added. The middle version of Stringer and top of Hamner shows the probable second editing as they moved the name and logo up to avoid the collision that had resulted. I have purchased all 36 variations of this set and am awaiting their arrival. I checked fairly thoroughly and found that this situation does NOT exist in the last series at all as all 36 have the name and logo properly positioned.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great info and find Thomas
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unless the Papai was on the bottom row of the uncut sheet, wouldn't there be a card below it that also has part of the blue line?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wonder if Ted Z would know or have sheet scan
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There should be.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |