|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sort of considering expanding on that list so the info about typical thickness is out there. A pressed card or corner would be thinner.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just based on some long ago memories, here are some observations:
Generally, Donruss cards were thinner than Topps, especially the first issue in 1981. I don't think they could even stand up straight by themselves. Early Upper Deck cards are also thin. Score cards from 1988 and 1989 seemed thicker than average. Topps traded/update seemed a bit thicker (at least in the 1980s) when the card stock was different than the regular issue. I've recently been putting together a 1957 T baseball set, and those cards are very thick.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-54) 1954 Bowman (-2) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm also curious about this as to how the thickness and quality of Topps cardstock changed over the years, from 50s-80s or so.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
1977 Topps, in particular, was printed on much thinner card stock than other Topps sets of the 1970's.
__________________
Check out my articles at Cardlines.com! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1964 Topps Thickness & Color Variation | xdrx | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 22 | 12-01-2022 10:21 AM |
| Ultra Pro 9 pocket pages for patch/relic cards + 70 pt thickness? | Beastmode | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 1 | 08-28-2017 12:07 PM |
| Question about E97 C. A. Briggs Co. thickness | Mainstreetsportscards | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 02-13-2015 11:35 PM |
| Thickness of T201 Mecca Double Folders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-18-2006 05:58 PM |
| 1915 Standard Biscuit card questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-17-2001 02:35 PM |