![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I mean, they can't be exactly equally bad, but it's not definitive from the absolute numbers of grading errors revealed to date that PSAs batting average with the doctored cards is worse than SGCs. I would guess it is, but it wouldn't surprise me either way. Certainly PSA has had vastly more plate appearances. That could be because Moser/Brent knew the cards had a better chance of getting through there, but PSA would also give them a better ROI even if they figured the cards had the same chance of getting through with SGC as with PSA.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historical Figures Mocking the Current Card Scandal | perezfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-14-2019 05:58 PM |
Help with 1967 Ice Bowl Participants. Looking to get signatures as part of a persona | skelly | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-01-2019 09:48 PM |
Hobby history: The fake-card scandal of 1972 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-13-2017 11:51 AM |
It's turning into a cottage industry..... | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-26-2014 11:47 AM |
There's new grading terminology in the industry..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-20-2009 02:37 PM |