 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-23-2019, 02:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
PSA is the benchmark...
I have posted on here many times. PSA cards are not generally better than sgc PSA is hard on corners but sgc is hard on surface and eye appeal. Corners aren't everything... I like needle corners... PSA has the market and sgc has alot of work to do. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk 
|
|
#2
06-23-2019, 02:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have you read any of the recent PWCC / Moser fraud threads? PSA is awful at grading cards. SGC is getting identified as passing $50,000 cards as unaltered. Would love to see your take. I'm up in the middle of the night today too.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
