![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4 sounds about right, although both cards look short to me.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
100% not trimmed, I have a stack of 54s and they are all the same height. I also just looked at them under a loupe to be sure and they look factory cut to me.
Thanks for the reply ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Which company? I think even as 4s at PSA, they'd both get OC or MC qualifiers.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading then and now... | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 11-19-2015 08:44 AM |