|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I can't tell that anything has been done other than a bump in grade. The thick mylar sleeve that BVG uses causes scans to look different. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
A 2 grade bump, especially FROM a Beckett holder to a PSA, seems highly unlikely to me without some improvement, but I'm not sure. The descriptions by PWCC sure are night and day which in and of itself is interesting.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 07-05-2019 at 04:47 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The shadows from the photo corners have been removed, and probably the indents they caused as well.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The right edge looks rougher in the PSA holder. The chipping on the upper left on the reverse looks worse. Last edited by Dpeck100; 07-05-2019 at 04:53 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think the white dots in that area of the front are debris inside the slab or on the scanner. That they weren't called out on the blowout post makes me think they see it that way too rather than as recoloring. I sort of whish it was in a PSA slab before. I looks like the red got brightened a lot, but that could be the scanner. A comparable before would help tell, but we don't have that. Both the chipping and roughness could be made worse by the soaking that removed the shadows from the album and corners. I had a good long look at them and sort of see what you're saying, but also see areas of the edges that are a tiny bit smoother. Again, that could just be the scans, but there has been some cleaning. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I thought soaking was deemed okay. So has anything really wrong been done? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Soaking in a chemical bath is not OK according to many or most.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Soaking of any post-war card is probably against the general consensus, because the composition of the cardboard differs. Soaking a pre-war card in distilled water does not damage the card, done properly. Soaking a post-war card probably does, especially with chemical solvents. And yes, this card appears to have the toning removed (a la the WWG DiMaggio).
Dpeck, just because some random guys on a message board say that "soaking is okay" doesn't make all soaking okay. Especially when PSA has N-7 and SGC has Cleaned as reasons they don't give number grades to cards that have been soaked with bleach. Quote:
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by jad22; 07-05-2019 at 07:17 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Potentially fake D350-3 Standard Biscuit backed cards on eBay | rhettyeakley | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 01-01-2024 08:24 PM |
| Fake Signed T206 Cards (Too Many to List in the Title, See First Post for List) | SetBuilder | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1061 | 09-04-2020 07:44 PM |
| Am I Potentially Getting Scammed? Paypal | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-20-2018 06:39 PM |
| How it feels to FINALLY cross your most-wanted card off your list..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-29-2007 12:15 PM |
| Potentially Dumb JSA/SGC Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-15-2006 07:42 AM |