PWCC Huigens Now Has a Criminal Defense Attorney

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

What does any of this have to do with a trial? It's a message board, not evidence.

What is said here can absolutely be used as evidence in a trial, no?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

What is said here can absolutely be used as evidence in a trial, no?

It would depend what it was and for what purpose it was being offered. What on this thread could possibly be admissible in a trial against PWCC or Brent?

[CuriousGeorge]

Originally Posted by Leon

What is said here can absolutely be used as evidence in a trial, no?

Yes this will all be Exhibit A in United States vs Brent Mastro. Leon, seriously you’re kidding right?

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by CuriousGeorge

Yes this will all be Exhibit A in United States vs Brent Mastro. Leon, seriously you’re kidding right?

This is where I'm confused....If Jeff is defending Brent then he is arguing Brent's knowledge to these crimes, correct? So if that's the case, why couldn't these posts and threads be a concern where he is blasting his credibility?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by CuriousGeorge

Yes this will all be Exhibit A in United States vs Brent Mastro. Leon, seriously you’re kidding right?

It is sort of hard to get a feel for sarcasm sometimes, over the internet. I guess it is common knowledge you can be held accountable for what you say on a public chat board. Or do you not think so?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

It is sort of hard to get a feel for sarcasm sometimes, over the internet. I guess it is common knowledge you can be held accountable for what you say on a public chat board. Or do you not think so?

What posts are we talking about here?

I thought this started in the context of this particular thread. I was responding to post 189.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

What posts are we talking about here?

I thought this started in the context of this particular thread. I was responding to post 189.

I was only talking in general context as I just stated. Sorry about that. As far as Jeff posting anything, or representing Brent, again, you guys and girls can talk about that stuff. I have my own thoughts. sorry about that.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

I was only talking in general context as I just stated. Sorry about that. As far as Jeff posting anything, or representing Brent, again, you guys and girls can talk about that stuff. I have my own thoughts. sorry about that.

Oh ok well sure in theory if something said here was relevant and otherwise admissible.

[Kenny Cole]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Oh ok well sure in theory if something said here was relevant and otherwise admissible.

You mean, like it wasn't hearsay or subject to an exception? Not a FRE 403 issue? Not a 404 issue? It would be pretty easy to make several other arguments to keep all of this out as well. I think you would have to be pretty imaginative and have a pretty understanding judge to get most of this in.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by Leon

What is said here can absolutely be used as evidence in a trial, no?

Sure, but Jeff isn't on trial.

EDIT: Actually nobody is! Yet.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

Sure, but Jeff isn't on trial.

My comments are not pertaining to Jeff, sorry for the miscommunication on my part. They are in general.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by Leon

My comments are not pertaining to Jeff, sorry for the miscommunication on my part. They are in general.

I understand, it just seemed the thread had taken the turn to trying the lawyer. You know pretty unequivocally where I stand, but that doesn't mean I think it's OK to attack someone's entire life, that's all.

I guess it makes me look like I approve of everything he does. Accept where I point out repeatedly that I don't