|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For this reason, even if PSA somehow overcomes the legal hurdle of patent infringement and manages to come up with a way to compete with a new company that uses the latest technology, I would think the new company would have a huge leg up, as who in his/her right mind would prefer PSA over this new company for purposes of reevaluating a PSA card? Last edited by benjulmag; 08-06-2019 at 06:34 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some people are saying "PSA will do this," "Registry will do that."
However, if the FBI and criminal prosecutions involving false grading are involved, the question will be how much say will PSA and Registry people in it? PSA may hope "Let's hope it all just blows over and people accept altered cards," and Registry people may say the same. However, if the FBI says these altered cards and the selling thereof (as non-alerted) is a criminal offense, and all these misgraded cards in the Registry are products of criminal or whatever behavior, PSA and Registry won't be able to just ignore it-- certainly not at resale time and grading time. I think their hands will be forced. At the least, the altered cards will have to be overtly labelled as altered (How the hobby prices those then is another matter), and PSA will have to address the altered cards. PSA will not be allowed to "whistle by the graveyard" or "grandfather clause" all their past mistakes . . . As I said in previous post, what does PSA now do when altered cards are resubmitted for grading? The now know many are altered, and the now know the FBI is involved. And what does the hobby as a whole now do, with so many people who resubmit cards hoping for a better grade? This all changes things a lot, and not in a way that PSA will be fond of. I firmly believe that PSA will have to address in serious fashion all the altered cards that they misgraded-- and there a ton of them, involving lots of $$ and a boatload of card owners, including wealthy Registry folk, who aren't going to be happy when their cards are addressed in serious fashion. Tell me how this isn't a problem, or at least a conundrumm (including in a legal sense), for PSA and Registry set owners? Last edited by drcy; 08-06-2019 at 07:24 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't know what if any impact the current FBI involvement will have on PSA, but I can say that based on my discussions with the FBI, I got the impression that they seem well aware of the limitations of the PSA business model. Last edited by benjulmag; 08-07-2019 at 08:41 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The link in the OP’s post starts with the following statement:
Sports Card Radio recently obtained an anonymous letter from a believed PSA insider. If what follows is true, involving some significant names in the hobby, it is really troubling. However, given the seriousness of the allegations, I would hope there is more behind it than an anonymous letter from a believed PSA insider. Anyone making these types of accusations should have to disclose their name and explain how they know these facts. Otherwise, reputations can be ruined for no reason. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1880s "Wright + Ditson"Trade Card "Low Ball" | Ben Yourg | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-17-2017 09:18 PM |
| FS ;;;#3 Dale Earnhardt 22 Karat Gold "Front Runner Sports Quest"Card Serial #007068 | GALYSPORTS | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-04-2017 03:55 PM |
| SOLD!!! T206 "TUBBY" SPENCER-BOSTON AMER! ONE "PHAT" CARD! Ends Thurs 9-25! | GoldenAge50s | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 09-25-2014 09:46 PM |
| 1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 02:28 PM |
| "The Vintage Spotlight" new segment premiering on Cardboard Connection Radio tonight | Gmrson | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-05-2013 01:33 PM |