 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-18-2019, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Im not crazy about the lower right corner and Im not entirely sure what is covering up the left half of the “c” in Chicago, but I also don’t see anything definitive that would lead me to feel the card is clearly restored.
If I were holed up in a cubicle in Newport Beach I think I would be okay giving this a 1 at this time. There might be something I am missing by not judging the card in hand though. Thanks for sharing. FYI-I took a second look after I posted this and noticed the right edge gets shorter near the center of the card then wider towards the corners. This could have given the grader pause as well. There is also what appears to be a different sploch of color near the left side of Chance’s neckline. It might just be a small stain. Very tough to tell from the scan. Last edited by Bigshot69; 08-18-2019 at 10:47 PM. 
|
|
#2
08-18-2019, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
They're calling that bottom right trimmed, I am almost positive.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions
|
|
#3
08-18-2019, 11:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't see where it's altered either. It all looks like honest wear to me and just a poor condition example. The authentic grade could just be from the excessive wear, but I don't see the altered part.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble (Outdated) Blog: Click Here
|
|
#4
08-18-2019, 11:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Wantlist: E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1 E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean
|
|
#5
08-19-2019, 07:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
08-19-2019, 08:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
All that being said I don't think the difference between that card in "A" or in "1" is going to be significant.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions
|
|
#7
08-19-2019, 09:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My rant wasn't directed at Scott, just a jumping off point.
|
|
#8
08-19-2019, 09:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sometimes they put a reason on the slab such as "Authentic Trimmed". I don't understand why it's not consistent.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 08-19-2019 at 10:00 AM.
|
|
#9
08-19-2019, 12:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The OP's card is in poor condition. Whether or not it was trimmed 100 years ago, it's in poor condition.
Personally, I wouldn't mind altered cards being graded as Poor 1, and I think it would be awesome for every altered PWCC and Gary Moser cards to be relabelled a 1. I'd love for the Gretzky Wagner to be relabelled as Poor 1. Talk about sending a message. I'd start a movement for altered cards, including restored cards, to be labeled Poor 1. Last edited by drcy; 08-19-2019 at 12:43 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's your favorite graded "Authentic/Altered" card you have? | mouschi | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 76 | 05-14-2019 08:51 AM |
| "AUTHENTIC" graded cards are not always what that "A" represents them to be ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-22-2016 09:18 PM |
| PSA "Authentic Altered" v. "Authentic Trimmed" | Bliggity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-12-2016 05:18 PM |
| Please explain: "MC015 Security notice: eBay listing removed" | nolemmings | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-10-2012 05:50 AM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 02:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
