Analysis of current AH's rules regarding shill/internal/sketchy bidding practices

aljurgela · #1 10-15-2019, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nolemmings

If Auction houses or their employees are allowed to place bids, it seems reasonable to expect them to disclose when they have done so. At present, we are left to guess. At least by the end of the auction, and preferably beforehand, all bids placed by the house or its staff should be identified as such in the item's bidding history.

+1 (though I think that the REA / LOTG policy is best)

Peter_Spaeth · #2 10-15-2019, 09:52 AM

It doesn't seem anyone can identify another AH that bids on and wins lots out of its own auctions.

calvindog · #3 10-15-2019, 10:03 AM

You mean besides Mastro?

Peter_Spaeth · #4 10-15-2019, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog

You mean besides Mastro?

Currently active.

benjulmag · #5 10-15-2019, 10:44 AM

This topic has come up before in other threads, but I have never been comfortable with an AH competing against its own customers by buying on the house account lots the AH feels are undervalued. A consignor can protect him/herself via a reserve price, and it seems to me that if the consignor is okay with letting the item go at a "wholesale" price, then the party that should reap the benefits is the AH customer, not the AH. The primary business of an AH is auctioning items, not buying undervalued items in its own auctions. And the profitability of the AH is directly tied to the business its bidding customers give them. So would it be so bad once in a while if a customer walked away believing he/she got a bargain?

I remember recently when I bought an item from a major AH. The item went for significantly less than both I and the AH thought the item was worth. But it met the reserve and I got it. The owner of the AH told me after the auction that while he felt bad his consignor did not get a stronger price, on the other hand he felt happy for me that I was able to get it at that price. That auction house does not buy on its account, and at least it could say its consignor's loss was its bidding customer's gain.

pokerplyr80 · #6 10-15-2019, 11:44 AM

As others have mentioned I agree it seems inherently unfair to have the auction house competing against bidders that have to pay a 20% premium. I'm sure there are many lots on Heritage I could win and flip for a profit if they'd waive that premium for me.

But I do respect the fact that they disclose and defend the practice. At least it is well known, and does help to protect consignors against the risk of having a lot sell well below market value.

Leon · #7 10-15-2019, 11:51 AM

From my understanding each HA person bidding, and winning, has to pay all BP.
They have profit centers, ya' know. And yes, I guess it does help consignors. Bummer....
I have won plenty of items from HA since selling my collection. I am at a loss in thinking why anyone would expect a bargain at an auction. But it seems as though some feel they are entitled to them. Hey, I like a great bargain too, I just don't feel entitled to them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

As others have mentioned I agree it seems inherently unfair to have the auction house competing against bidders that have to pay a 20% premium. I'm sure there are many lots on Heritage I could win and flip for a profit if they'd waive that premium for me.

But I do respect the fact that they disclose and defend the practice. At least it is well known, and does help to protect consignors against the risk of having a lot sell well below market value.

benjulmag · #8 10-15-2019, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

As others have mentioned I agree it seems inherently unfair to have the auction house competing against bidders that have to pay a 20% premium. I'm sure there are many lots on Heritage I could win and flip for a profit if they'd waive that premium for me.

But I do respect the fact that they disclose and defend the practice. At least it is well known, and does help to protect consignors against the risk of having a lot sell well below market value.

Certainly disclosure goes a long way toward addressing notions of unfairness. I do not believe disclosure, though, to be an end in and of itself, as in the real world many bidders do not read auctions rules. So in those instances when the rule varies significantly from industry norm, I question whether an AH should not do more than bury the disclosure in the fine print.

In the case we are discussing with Heritage, almost certainly they do factor in the forgone BP when deciding how high to bid. If they win the item, at say $1,000 where the underbid is $950 and the BP 20%, the price they "paid" was $1,190.00, where $190 of that is the BP on the underbid which they chose to forgo. The price to you at the $1,000 hammer would have been $1,200, so in this example you would have been at a $10 disadvantage (less than 1%).

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Shill Bidding	ullmandds	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	27	05-11-2016 09:08 PM
Reporting Fraudulent Listing Practices on eBay, e.g., Shill Bidding	scotgreb	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	6	05-12-2014 05:19 PM
Shill bidding? Need some help.	bundy462	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	8	08-14-2013 06:26 AM
Shill bidding	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	12-05-2006 04:38 PM
Shill Bidding?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	05-03-2003 12:04 AM