T-205 or T-207

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Each time I start coming back around to prewar, I have a similar dilemma except it is deciding between collecting T205 or T206. So I know how you feel, OP.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[Leon]

Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy

Each time I start coming back around to prewar, I have a similar dilemma except it is deciding between collecting T205 or T206. So I know how you feel, OP.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I am currently doing a subset of T206 and limping along on the T205s. Too many eggs in my basket for my type card mentality.

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Originally Posted by Leon

I am currently doing a subset of T206 and limping along on the T205s. Too many eggs in my basket for my type card mentality.

If I were to pursue one of these, it would be T206 HOFers.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[Leon]

Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy

If I were to pursue one of these, it would be T206 HOFers.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

And that is most like the way I will go. T205s have been fun but I think I like the T206 subset I am doing more. So we will see where that goes.
To the question of the thread, as for the T207s, I think they might be an acquired taste.

[Mark]

In my view, t207 has a cleaner look, and it seems to contain a lot of cards that are not in t206, so it seems, to me, a natural set to follow up on the t206. True, there will be lacuna, but when you make progress in the set, it will be clear that you have a collection rather than an accumulation.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Wow John W that's impressive on the T207. I am partial to T205 myself though.

[GeoPoto]

http://net54baseball.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=374475&stc=1&d=1574690005
http://net54baseball.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=374476&stc=1&d=1574690015