![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gum or wax they are two entirely different stains. wax doesn't bother me a ton on a card for my collection. gum stain no thank you.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Gum stains on the other hand, can penetrate the card's surface and cause 'bubbling' on the front. They seem to be a more permanent type of damage than the wax stains. Probably some of the worst cards for gum stains were the 1981 Donruss and Fleer- their first issues. I can remember putting entire boxes of them in the freezer to be able to 'pop' the gum off the card. Hey, maybe there are still some boxes in there - I'd better check on that.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where do you all stand on gumstains? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 10-30-2013 01:32 AM |