Scg

[Ben Yourg]

Here is the card,that I have been talking about.
It is a real nice blue.Not as it shows.Printing on back is nice,dark and perfectly clear.
Not as my computer shows.
Very light creases across front "Knee Level" ,and under arm pit,
to the left.And across chest.EXCEPT FOR THE KNEE LEVEL,THE OTHERS ARE VERY HARD, TO EVEN SEE?
What do you think?
Is it worthy of more,than a "POOR"?

Ben

[Bill77]

My T205 Wilbur Goode is graded the same. It really isn't anything new with PSA. I think that if your card has more than one crease PSA will just grade it a 1.

[Tom S.]

It's hard to tell from the blurry back scan, but it looks like there is a sliver of paper loss within the crease on the back of the card to the left of Tennant's name.

The PSA 1 grade would be due to that in my opinion.

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by Tom S.

It's hard to tell from the blurry back scan, but it looks like there is a sliver of paper loss within the crease on the back of the card to the left of Tennant's name.

The PSA 1 grade would be due to that in my opinion.

If PSA is looking that closely at this card to notice micro issues that drop this pretty card to a 1 (and it should be no greater than a 2.5 IMO), then how the hell are they missing so many obvious trims and alterations?!

[Ben Yourg]

No,the crease shows lightly on the back.
But no paper missing.

[ALBB]

I will give you a Fair on it

[Republicaninmass]

Sgc maybe 1.5, if that is what you'd like. Least 2 creases

[buymycards]

I would guess a 1.5. A 1 on a bad day, a 2 on a good day, but probably a 1.5.