|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tough question Jeff...
Variables aside, I'd definitely rather have a Type 2 from the original negative with better photo quality and clarity. Just my personal preference, as the central image is what matters to me the most. "Type 1" obviously performs far better in auctions and sells for much more, as that's what most people want. So it's hard to state what the Type 2 value should be when looking at it as a percentage of Type 1. It's difficult to separate personal preferences from market value. The already established prices realized and potential resale are such big factors in assessing value. If I had to put a personal number to it, maybe 35-40% (Type 2 as a percentage of Type 1). But even that depends upon the photo quality and subject matter. I like to collect those early Composite display-type photos, which technically do not receive a Type 1 designation. So that muddies it up even more for me. Sorry for the rambling non-answer! Last edited by perezfan; 04-17-2020 at 12:19 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 Press Photos... | jgmp123 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 38 | 05-05-2024 06:40 PM |
| Price Reduction Photos Added Type I Photos for Sale | 71buc | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 8 | 03-28-2019 01:55 PM |
| RMY: HOF type one photos | Bicem | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 02-15-2019 11:14 PM |
| Type 1 photos - 1922 World Series program - photos used for cards | horzverti | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 4 | 10-17-2016 04:58 PM |
| Original Photos / Type I photos and Autographs | CharleyBrown | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 12 | 12-05-2011 01:38 AM |