PSA question

[MailboxBaseball]

I personally prefer SGC much more than PSA for anything pre-1933.

PSA uses that mylar layer at their discretion which i think displays “not so well.” And for T206s they seem to use it a lot. I even offered to pay them to remove the mylar from my cards and they said no. So that was cool.

SGC has great customer service but i think they should stop changing their presentations/flips so often. I like the SGC flips with the smaller numbers much more.

Neither company is perfect, but i find dealing with SGC to be actually consistently enjoyable, and dealing with PSA to be consistently aggravating.

[MailboxBaseball]

And no I dont work for SGC

[bksv99]

I have to agree with Mailbox, SGC easier to deal with, and most customers, clients, collectors prefer it to PSA for pre war cards. Just my two cents

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by bksv99

I have to agree with Mailbox, SGC easier to deal with, and most customers, clients, collectors prefer it to PSA for pre war cards. Just my two cents

They don't get the money PSA does unfortunately. I wish they did.

[3rdinfintry]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

They don't get the money PSA does unfortunately. I wish they did.

They will at some point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[blametony]

Thanks all. I think I'm going to go with SGC. The cards are T206 cards for a set I'm building and I have no intention of flipping or selling anytime soon.

[MailboxBaseball]

Originally Posted by blametony

Thanks all. I think I'm going to go with SGC. The cards are T206 cards for a set I'm building and I have no intention of flipping or selling anytime soon.

Thats cool, good luck with them