 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-27-2020, 05:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for sharing those Cliff, quite interesting. The 65s Bryans WLs seem to be fairly rare, especially considering that the Bryan card is one of the most common cards from that set(IMO). Also, the picture used on the 66 card was clearly taken within a very short period of time from when the picture used on the 65 card.
__________________
To ensure I offend NO ONE, the image used as my avatar is indeed my own card. 
|
|
#2
05-30-2020, 11:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
 1959 Topps - [Base] #434 - Hal Griggs Courtesy of COMC.com Red print hickey/fisheye below the capital G in Griggs is recurring.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#3
05-30-2020, 02:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
While each version looks to be nearly equally plentiful, there appears to be 3 different versions on this 72 606 Melendez card. The first (top left) has a full blue circle around the name, on the second copy (top right) the right side of the circle is missing some blue, while the third copy is missing about half the blue. And yes, there is a secondary variation on this card, the blue spot below the left shoulder is recurring.
|
|
#5
06-01-2020, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good ones, Joe
|
|
#6
06-02-2020, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1952 variant
This scan was sent to me by David Pierson from the Aloha state. He used to post here as cardboard junkie but was banned sometime back. Scarce like the Campos back defect but recurring
 
|
|
#7
06-02-2020, 04:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#8
06-02-2020, 04:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
These have already been discussed but I can now show the three of them in one scan and what I believe is the fourth card affected. It's possible that there is a more severe version of the Susce, this one is partially missing black ink on the cartoon character's shoe, his head and hat, and a letter 'a'. It's also possible that a fifth card Billy Muffett is missing ink but I doubt it exists, it was under Slaughter on the sheet. I couldn't figure out how to enlarge the scan for the site so I took a picture which is only a little better.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#9
06-02-2020, 05:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here are the four cards individually to show more detail.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 06-02-2020 at 05:16 PM. Reason: Rearranged scans
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
