Comparing Cap Anson Photos ears? (Is it him)

[Directly]

So the slope angle of the ears change too--if they do that answers the difference in the shapes. So my photo may still be Anson--yes or no?

[Directly]

Sorry I didn't alter

[bmarlowe1]

Originally Posted by Directly

Sorry I didn't alter-just ridiculous disgusting allegations as usual--

Oh, we aren't suppose to disagree with your options, because really in the real world that's all it is--

You haven't expressed an opinion, you have only posted a crudely cut out (by somebody) of Anson head with part of his ear sliced off.

[yanks12025]

Originally Posted by bmarlowe1

You haven't expressed an opinion, you have only posted a crudely cut out (by somebody) of Anson head with part of his ear sliced off.

I think it might be because his photo is a type 1 and it looks like that gray paint that they’d put around photos for newspapers.

[bmarlowe1]

Yeah I think you are right.

[Directly]

Originally Posted by yanks12025

I think it might be because his photo is a type 1 and it looks like that gray paint that they’d put around photos for newspapers.

Thanks for the input, because I didn't alter my photo- , in this particular scenario due to the cropping, the ears shouldn't always be the final conclusion-- Yes my photo Anson--case closed!

[oldjudge]

That photo was altered by someone or Anson had the strangest head shape I have ever seen. Not sure what the purpose of the post was, but whatever it was it only succeeded in making the original poster look silly.

[Directly]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

That photo was altered by someone or Anson had the strangest head shape I have ever seen. Not sure what the purpose of the post was, but whatever it was it only succeeded in making the original poster look silly.

In making a point that not all photo's can be determined only by the ears as the first and only conclusion--please don't brainwashed