1966 Topps High's - Any uncut sheets or partial sheets known?

Kevvyg1026 · #1 07-08-2020, 04:59 PM

Here's 597 miscut. I think it is 582 to its left but I am open toAttachment 408753 other possibilities. We now that 597, 592, and 549 are in the same row.

Kevvyg1026 · #2 07-08-2020, 05:00 PM

Attachment 408754

BillP · #3 07-09-2020, 07:25 AM

Great find. I consider all of these as non sp's until proven wrong. Agree on 582 roggenburk to the left. Not to many blue base cards in the 7th series.

Kevvyg1026 · #4 07-10-2020, 02:44 AM

I suspect that all four are in the row headed by Taylor. It would be great to find a miscut (or 2-3) that identifies the cards above/below these four.

Cliff Bowman · #5 07-11-2020, 08:24 PM

.

Kevvyg1026 · #6 07-12-2020, 05:08 AM

Thanks for those miscuts. I can't tell for certain, but the Tiger team miscut may have Perry (598) to its left. The Nicholson miscut has either Franks (537), Tebbetts (552) or a rookie card underneath it. Since we know most of the cards surrounding rookie cards (except for 549 & 553), my suspicion is that it may be Tebbetts. I believe the Mantilla card is showing the top of Shirley/Jackson card (591).

Cliff Bowman · #7 07-12-2020, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Thanks for those miscuts. I can't tell for certain, but the Tiger team miscut may have Perry (598) to its left. The Nicholson miscut has either Franks (537), Tebbetts (552) or a rookie card underneath it. Since we know most of the cards surrounding rookie cards (except for 549 & 553), my suspicion is that it may be Tebbetts. I believe the Mantilla card is showing the top of Shirley/Jackson card (591).

I think you nailed it as Perry, matches up perfectly.

rats60 · #8 07-12-2020, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Thanks for those miscuts. I can't tell for certain, but the Tiger team miscut may have Perry (598) to its left. The Nicholson miscut has either Franks (537), Tebbetts (552) or a rookie card underneath it. Since we know most of the cards surrounding rookie cards (except for 549 & 553), my suspicion is that it may be Tebbetts. I believe the Mantilla card is showing the top of Shirley/Jackson card (591).

That would make sense. Those were always 2 of the toughest cards in the set. Now to figure out what row they were in.

Cliff Bowman · #9 07-13-2020, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Here's 597 miscut. I think it is 582 to its left but I am open toAttachment 408753 other possibilities. We now that 597, 592, and 549 are in the same row.

I didn’t realize that one had already been discussed, I have a good excuse this time with all of the outages and scans disappearing going on. There are no scans in those posts now.

Kevvyg1026 · #10 07-14-2020, 05:23 AM

Here's a miscut of 553. Posted before, but with the issues over the past week, thought I would post again. Any suggestions about what might be next to it?MC_35_553-Rookie-Stars-VG-VGEX.jpg

Kevvyg1026 · #11 07-14-2020, 08:33 AM

There are several possibilities. I'm thinking it might be 570, but am open to suggestions.

BillP · #12 07-14-2020, 08:14 PM

I have always considered 553 a not very tough get. always off center. How many unknown spots let on the salmon and taylor rows? also knowing that with what cards haven't been placed yet and generally which of those unplaced do folks consider easier or a beckett non sp?

just trying to come at this from another angle. has anyone tried to look for miscut backs for clues?

bill

G1911 · #13 07-15-2020, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillP

I have always considered 553 a not very tough get. always off center. How many unknown spots let on the salmon and taylor rows? also knowing that with what cards haven't been placed yet and generally which of those unplaced do folks consider easier or a beckett non sp?

just trying to come at this from another angle. has anyone tried to look for miscut backs for clues?

bill

I've struck out completely on the backs. A tiny sliver of the front is usually enough, due to the color scheme for different teams + the widely different backgrounds at the edges in the posed shot, enough to ID. The backs have to be much further off center to ID which card is adjacent. But then again, I've only found a few and Cliff seems to find 20 a day lol

Kevvyg1026 · #14 07-15-2020, 06:07 AM

There are six openings in the Perranowski row, Hoerner row, & Taylor row. There are three openings in both the Salmon & Shirley rows.

However, we have a four-card sequence (582, 597, 592, & 549). I suspect that this sequence is in the Taylor row since none are that hard to acquire (i.e., suspected non-SP). I also suspect that 553 is in this row.

We also have a sequence of 598, 583, & 569 adjacent to each other, with 595 under 598 and 523 under 583.

We have 532 next to 552 and most likely 576 is above 552.

And 517 (checklist) is at the end of a row, and is most likely at end of Perranowski, Hoerner, or Shirley row.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1985 Topps Baseball Uncut Sheet w/ Puckett RC * 1987 Uncut Sheets in Box	mintacular	1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T	2	11-20-2017 02:22 PM
Topps uncut sheets	mybestbretts	Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present)	7	11-26-2014 01:30 PM
1972 Topps uncut partial sheets	SAllen2556	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	7	07-07-2014 12:50 PM
1955 Topps uncut sheets	chadeast	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	20	06-22-2012 09:52 AM
1952-60 Uncut Topps Sheets	Archive	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	2	01-07-2008 03:46 PM