Recent variation sell prices

[Cliff Bowman]

Compared to the 1967 Topps Monteagudo and Nen missing black ink cards the 1967 Topps Spiezio missing black ink is plentiful, but the Spiezio is recognized by PSA and has been accepted as a variation even though it is just a recurring print flaw. I’m sure the PSA registry plays a part too.

[nwobhm]

A recurring print flaw is a variation. I am currently working on a 1962 project where there is a print flaw variation that has characteristics exclusive to only that particular print run. The card can be identified by the print defects on either side. They even have, for lack of a better desciption, a green tint error that doesn't fall in the accepted green tint number set.

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by nwobhm

A recurring print flaw is a variation.

This is a point of view that has been discussed thoroughly in the past.....please share some images of the variations you mention.

[nwobhm]

Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes

This is a point of view that has been discussed thoroughly in the past.....please share some images of the variations you mention.

I certainly will once I have enough copies in hand.

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

Compared to the 1967 Topps Monteagudo and Nen missing black ink cards the 1967 Topps Spiezio missing black ink is plentiful, but the Spiezio is recognized by PSA and has been accepted as a variation even though it is just a recurring print flaw. I’m sure the PSA registry plays a part too.

I agree that the Monteagudo and Nen are indeed more scarce....the registry is certainly an influencer of raw prices.