|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The problem I have with the Dimaggio is that it looks really slowly signed, and some of the letters (the J in Joe, The D in Dimaggio and the loops in the G's seem a bit odd like someone was going slow. Joe, for the most part, had more of a lighter touch (even with a sharpie) to the point where you could see he lifted the pen in spots. Just seems like this one was really heavy handed, especially if this was in the early 80's. Since you got it through the mail, you're not out anything, but you have to decide if you want to keep it and always wonder, spend the money and authenticate it (and maybe not pass) or just get another one. No right or wrong, just what ever you can live with.
__________________
Pride of the Yankees movie project - ongoing Catfish Hunter Regular Season Win Tickets - 25/224 Post Season 0/9 1919 Black Sox - I'm calling it complete...maybe! 1955 Dodger Autographs...41/43 1934 Gas House Gang Autographs...Complete 1969 Cubs Autographs...Black Cat ticket plus 30/50 1960 Pirates autographs...Complete 1961 Yankees autographs...Complete 1971-1975 A's Playoff/WS roster autos...Complete |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
here is a legit Joe D that I rec'd TTM in the 1979/80 time period (it now resides in a PSA/DNA slab):
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree with others regarding Aaron being a clubhouse and Musial being authentic. I do believe the DiMaggio to be authentic as well. I've seen a couple similar index cards (signed at the top, a bit "slow") that came with the provenance of being TTM.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
....
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMO the Dimaggio looks good. Musial good, Aaron no. I think what happened with Dimaggio and the shaky D (because I agree with everyone that says it looks slow,) is that he didn't realize how near the top he was signing on the card. So to overcompensate and avoid going off the top he slowed down a bit.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for that response. That makes some sense to me...the PSA 3x5 exemplar that looks similar is signed a little further down on the index card, so "crowding" at the top wasn't an issue. Another exemplar, dated to 1985, showed a lot of similar traits as well. Given all the responses, I think I will send this off to PSA along with a batch of others just to see...it is worth the modest cost just to see their opinion as well... I will post the "results" when I get them.
This has been a great education for me...and again, I appreciate all the assistance and opinions Mike |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, in my opinion it would definitely be worth sending off to get looked at. This is definitely not the ghost signer, so that's in your favor. I am very confident it's good.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SOLD! 1956 Joe Dimaggio and the Dimaggio Brothers San Francisco Seals Program | Shoeless Moe | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 4 | 04-23-2017 08:21 PM |
| Value Help- DiMaggio | pitchingace77 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 10-30-2015 09:24 PM |
| Trade? my '38 Goudey Dimaggio for your '38 Goudey Dimaggio | Kzoo | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-02-2014 04:38 PM |
| Dimaggio painting value? '49 Dimaggio watercolor | Leon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 09-17-2013 10:30 PM |
| '38 DiMaggio #274 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 08-04-2008 12:42 AM |