![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First, great card!
This one is tough. Normally, an error/freak card like this would have serious appeal to a certain type of collector who will pay a premium for the “oddity”. But this is such a major card, that I imagine many buyers would want a non-oddity. That said, the Whitey Plank - a Piedmont-backed t206 plank devoid of color graded A - is worth many multiples above what a normal “A” would be. So even freaks of major cards can sell for serious premiums. I don’t think the card goes for anywhere near $200k, but, in an auction, I do think if you get two guys that want an oddity of a legendary card, the value could go high. If you only have one guy, it could be a dud. Thus, the $20k - $200k range is not that nuts |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks. I was talking percentages at 20% to 200%, not dollars.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love the front, but the back isn't appealing. I'd be more in the SGC 30 range on this card.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Firstly I think Ryan laid it out really well. The Venue to find out would be a high profile auction like an REA or Heritage.
In terms of an estimate - 20% sounds awfully low. If it turns out ot be a dud - I would think 50% minimum. 200% seems like potentially realistic optimism. SO I guess I'm tightening the range a bit 50-200% |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh man, I totally missed the %. I think if it goes over 100% it could certainly go way over 100%. But I am not sure it gets past 50%. So I agree with the range that Howard set forth. The one thing I am pretty sure of is that this card will not go for 100% / FMV for a normal SGC 4. This card will either go for way more or way less than a normal SGC 4.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not the same caliber card, but I remember seeing a signed 41 play ball DiMaggio at the national a couple years ago. I would have paid the ask, or close at least, but it had a wrong back. It didn't do anything for me. I would personally put it at about 75% but have no idea what the hobby consensus is or what wrong back collectors would pay
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Agreed It is very hard to tell value with a unique card like this. However, on a percentage I don't know it goes over 100%. Maybe. But if I did the set I might want a regular one. I guess as a type collector ![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-31-2020 at 07:36 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also important to note that the Leaf set is plagued with printing issues, bad cuts, and other production issues. Including mismatched backs. I doubt very much a misprinted Leaf would get much of a premium because the set has so many known condition issues. Love the set but manufacturing controls were really weak.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 08-31-2020 at 08:08 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948 Leaf Satchel Paige - blank back - on eBay.... | luciobar1980 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 154 | 09-07-2021 10:02 PM |
FS: Rare Slate Gray 49B & 49 Leaf wrong back | jimmysuitcase | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 03-02-2019 07:00 PM |
WTB 48 Leaf SP miscuts, wrong-back, etc | steve_a | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-19-2015 07:44 PM |
FS 1948 Leaf Boxing Wrong Back Cards | ezez420 | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 0 | 12-06-2013 05:46 AM |
1948 Leaf Paige Are there variations to the back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-03-2006 03:17 PM |