 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-24-2020, 01:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I’m going to guess that it was on the bottom of the sheet, will have to look for 64 uncut sheets and miscut Roggenburk’s.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” 
|
|
#2
09-24-2020, 04:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There was a 64 Roggenburk printed on the bottom row and I would say 99.6% that is the origin of that print flaw on it.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#3
09-25-2020, 11:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Cliff
|
|
#4
09-25-2020, 02:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know this is post 1980, but this thread looks to be where the action is on print errors and variations...I just found this card in my 82 Topps commons box. What the heck happened here? Anyone seen one like this before?
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
|
|
#5
09-25-2020, 03:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Soaked-in-Windex variation?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#6
09-25-2020, 07:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#7
09-25-2020, 08:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
|
|
#8
09-25-2020, 10:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That could be from a couple things.
A dry print, where the plate doesn't get dampened and retains ink everywhere. During washdown, where they cleaned ink off the blanket with solvent, which smears it at first. But that usually isn't this consistent. Or, a sheet of paper, or the surface of a sheet got stuck on the blanket, and retained ink since it's porous. Of those, I think it's probably the last one.
|
|
#9
09-26-2020, 06:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, I have one or two 1982s that have most of the card covered in that blue color. Although, if memory serves, it does not cover the entire card like yours, more like 2/3 or card.
Quote:
|
|
#10
09-26-2020, 08:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the 1982 Topps E* sheet, Glenn Hubbard is the third card on the fourth row and Dewey Robinson is the fifth card on the fifth row. Undoubtedly at the very least the cards surrounding them were also printed with the same defect.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#11
10-01-2020, 09:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
print defect?
What type of print error is this blue streak? Is it recurring across the sheet? I saw about 12% of the cards listed for 1966, #381 with it this morning, but did not see others.
1966_381_blue.jpg
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
