![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No guarantee they'd have the same number of copies. One could be double printed in a series just because of which row they ended up on the sheet.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In all of the sheets I have seen from 1961 to 1968, the checklists from the 88 card sheets were printed in equal numbers. Typically, checklist 1 was double-printed in the series 1 printing but then the series 2 checklist was printed in both the first & 2nd print run (usually twice in run 1, 3x in run 2). Checklist 3 was printed in both print run 2 & 3 (3x in each), checklist 4 was printed 3x in each print run 3 & 4, etc. When it came to series 7, only checklist 7 was printed.
It is possible that in the 77 card series (typically series 5, 6,or 7), one checklist might be in a row that was printed more frequently than the other, but I haven't seen that in any of the sheets, partial sheets, or sheet re-constructions that have been completed. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On conventional 88 card print sheets, there are 8 rows of cards printed 3x each across the full 264 card sheet. One slit (half-sheet) should have two checklists of series 2 and one of the series 3, while the second slit would have one of checklist 2 and two of series 3. Same pattern would repeat in the 3rd print run, etc. Here's an image of the two half-slits from 1964 & 1965 (series 3 shown, but same point) to illustrate.
1964_series_3_sheet_A.jpg 1964_series_3_sheet_B.jpg 1965_series_3.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is possible, of course, that a wrong back could exist on a checklist, caused by an improper feed.
|
![]() |
|
|