|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've expressed this before, what makes a top collectible in any field isn't any of the things that are usually thought of, at least not on their own.
This hobby has a number of great examples, the 52 Mantle being one of them. Is it "rare"? Not exactly. It's a double print, so as part of the 52 high numbers it's one of the three most common. So why don't any of the other 52 high numbers even get close? It's got all the other factors. It's not common, but also not so rare that someone who wants one can't find one. The subject is very popular. There's even a great story, that the 52 high numbers are "rare" because the remainders were dumped in the harbor/river/ocean And that really all it takes. It doesn't hurt that the set it's from is a great looking set. Or that his popularity is in NY, one of the larger cities. It shares those things with some of the other very expensive collectibles at the top of their respective hobbies. The Wagner T206 of course The inverted "Jenny" airmail stamp The "CIA invert stamp -- although less so, because it's newer and not a particularly good looking stamp. The 1804 Silver dollar And maybe the 1913 liberty nickel (although it IS rare, it also has the great story/mystery) |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I suppose we'll never know for sure - which of course makes the story attractive because it was possible - just adding to the mystique of the '52 Mantle.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-08-2020 at 02:34 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 10-08-2020 at 03:35 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hmmm, a warehouse that no one had thought to enter in sixty years - I wish there were one of those in my neighborhood. Even if such a thing could happen, how many new cases of high numbers would be required to drop the asking price of those cards? The only such find that comes to mind is the hoard of Topps Red Backs that someone uncovered back in the '80's, and I don't recall that the market value of that issue was much affected by it, perhaps because there wasn't much anyway. But, who knows - maybe that incident was in the news when Berger sat for the interview in which he made the notorious claim and it inspired him to spin an imaginative tale.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would add to that the fact that I suspect a lot of people just want one to be able to say they own one. Pure demand with no reason other than the desire to own one because it is THE THING to do. Maybe it is someone scraping enough together to afford their top card or someone who has money to burn and realizes that people will drool all over a nice copy if they buy one.
For exactly those couple of reasons you state that the card should NOT be that much more valuable, or at least the other 52 High numbers should be worth more than they are, proves this to me. The demand for the card, regardless of what the price rises to is never satisfied by the supply so the price continues to rise and rise, yet so many other cards are harder to find and cost considerably less. The Pafko is another example of a card being "worth" way more than it should be worth. . Quote:
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed. I've always thought that card was way over-hyped. The rarity in it being #1 is totally related to condition, but should have nothing to do with the card's production. It's not a scarce high number. I'm ok with truly great condition, NM Pafko's going for a premium, but there isn't really anything special about G and VG copies.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-09-2020 at 07:39 AM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not saying that this is your guy, but here's an example of a card that might fit the bill to fill that hole in your set. It's been hanging around the 'bay for quite some time and has grown a 'rona beard while looking for a home. Personally, I think the card is still waaayyy overpriced.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-54) 1954 Bowman (-2) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) Last edited by Bigdaddy; 10-15-2020 at 07:37 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Love the "Rona" beard! LOL
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson has also jumped into the thousands for even the beaters.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Age old collecting conundrum | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-17-2020 09:16 AM |
| Collector's Conundrum | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-26-2016 10:55 PM |
| Buyer's conundrum ... | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-18-2016 06:57 PM |
| Conundrum!!! | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-22-2012 12:34 AM |
| Ebay feedback conundrum | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-30-2011 05:17 PM |