|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which O/C Version Do You Prefer? | |||
| Pushed to the LEFT |
|
3 | 3.19% |
| Pushed to the RIGHT |
|
5 | 5.32% |
| Pushed to the TOP |
|
24 | 25.53% |
| Pushed to the BOTTOM |
|
62 | 65.96% |
| Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's some pretty slick photoshopping there. Kudos.
Never really thought about it but it's neat to see them all in a row like that. Suppose if I had to choose I'd go with the last one (pushed to the bottom) but I'm not real sure why. I suppose when I first analyze a card, that's the last direction I mentally measure so to me it's the least obvious. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I went with pushed to the top, because my art degree tells me that matted photos are supposed to have a larger bottom boarder and small top boarder. It was just something hammered into me every semester while cutting mattes for my photography class finals for four years. But honestly speaking I have cards that are off center in every direction because sometimes the price is too good to pass up.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
For some reason (maybe because I'm a moderate liberal) my eyes tend to concentrate on the center and left parts of cards.
__________________
Baseball cards will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no baseball cards.--The Fabulous Furry Freak Bros. (paraphrased) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
4 ... and then 2
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This brought a smile to my face.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
For left/right I would take #1 based on the image, Mantle is facing left to a more open space because of the skinny border and allows the eye to flow off the image and leave the card. #2 he is facing a wall with nowhere for your eye to leave the image. The diagonal red border on the left also helps balance against the heavy border on the right.
Up down would be #4 pushed to the bottom since the large red name border balances with the large top border. Last edited by Casey2296; 10-15-2020 at 05:45 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pushed to the bottom
Pushed to the top Never liked cards OC side to side. Last edited by Jim65; 10-15-2020 at 06:27 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On my 53 Bowmans, which are notoriously oc, my preference is pushed to the bottom and to the right. It also depends on the image, some cards don't display well oc especially if it's side to side.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I generally prefer slightly OC top to bottom, but also care way more about how bad the OC problem is over and above what the direction of the problem is. I can usually live with 70/30 one way, cards worse than about 85/15 usually tend to bug me, though I will say in cases of really "bad" off-centering - it usually depends on the individual card. For example because of the way the borders were designed - some '53 Topps cards can be waaaay OC and not bother me at all. But for a set with background contrast and white borders where the centering is going to be very obvious (most '57 Topps cards, for example) that doesn't work.
I will say that I still kind of look at the sudden explosion of "centering as the number one condition criteria" only in the 21st century as kind of humorous. Sure, centering is important - bad centering beyond a certain point can totally destroy the eye appeal of a card - but to me it's still just one aspect of condition and grading. I'd much rather have a mildly OC card with perfect color and registration than a perfectly centered one that is slightly faded or has print problems. I will admit about a decade or so ago I kind of hopped on the centering train as it were, and was very picky for a period of time. Then at one point I had two different copies of a '73 Schmidt which matched what I just said. Comparing them side by side to me it was a no brainer which dupe to sell - I sold the better centered one that had worse color and slight print snow, and kept the slightly OC one that to me looked better. The cards were raw, but both arguably in the EX-MT range.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-27-2020 at 08:27 AM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
Last edited by frankhardy; 10-22-2020 at 09:43 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| O/C Preference | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 02-25-2018 05:06 AM |
| P2 Pin Collecting Preference | boneheadandrube | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-09-2015 04:20 PM |
| Simple Auction Site Poll | thehoodedcoder | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-28-2014 08:00 AM |
| 1915 CJ's... Am I Alone On This Preference? | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 10-05-2013 03:54 AM |
| Simple Poll: PSA 5 w/ Crease -- Disclose? | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 06-28-2011 10:33 PM |