|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Were the 1974 Traded cards an additional card in a pack or was there one less of the base cards in a pack that included a Traded card?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There was one less base card. They were not an extra bonus like topps did with inserts in their 60s and early 70s packs. My recollection is that when you bought a box with the traded cards you often got multiple traded cards in many packs.
Last edited by rats60; 10-24-2020 at 04:55 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting, so the Traded were not inserts then. To me, further proof they were meant to be part of the regular set.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about selling a near complete 1954 Topps set | ColumbiaComics | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-03-2018 01:09 PM |
| What constitutes a perfectly centered T206? | mechanicalman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-26-2015 10:54 AM |
| Question about grading complete sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-25-2009 08:31 PM |
| Question: I am trying to complete the E-91 set (A,B,C) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-21-2006 04:52 PM |
| I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 02:42 PM |