|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
For me CJs are hands down some of the best looking pre-war cards. I like them all but prefer some light staining.
Here’s a couple of my favorites- ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by investinrookies; 10-28-2020 at 02:43 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
great cards! a 6 ex-mt grade it the top for me for a vintage card, anything higher and it probably had work done lol
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can't be the only one in this thread that didn't think "Hmm, I should go check out some stained CJs on Ebay, might find one I like!"
ummmmm... 4 possibilities here: 1. I've got this totally wrong (distinct possibility, well not really, the card isn't even printed in the right direction!!!) 2. The expert graders got this totally wrong (I mean very unlikely, RIGHT???) 3. People are getting really good at cracking and swapping 4. There are some pretty nice counterfeit slabs with reprint cards Which of the 4 do you think is most likely? It looks like all kinds of wrong right from the jump to me. Just pointing out a few, of the many, red alerts. Sad part is, it's got a bid and plenty of watchers already lining up to snipe it. Keep in mind it does have the "fugitive ink technology" slab Last edited by oldeboo; 10-26-2020 at 08:42 PM. Reason: addition |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would it surprise me if PSA got this wrong? Of course not. But if this is a counterfeit slab, all I have to say is, Wow. That's a very good reproduction slab, if that's the case of course.
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, I'm down to those two options. There really is no visible evidence of that case being opened. Certainly agree that if it's a counterfeit slab, they got the details correct it seems.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow! that certainly would be a big shock. the dover reprints are on a completely different type of card stock. the staining looks legit. if that's a fake, someone did a heck of a job
..now that I look closer, I don't like the look of the paper in the upper left where there's visible wear. doesn't look right to me at all
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time. Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 10-26-2020 at 12:48 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Those are great looking cards!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I Prefer My Cracker Jacks Stained | ksfarmboy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 04-03-2017 11:42 AM |
| Trading 1914 Cracker Jacks for 1914/1915 CJ | ecRich | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 07-12-2014 09:03 PM |
| Looking to buy 1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 11:31 AM |
| 1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-02-2012 10:20 AM |
| 1914 Cracker Jacks available | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2008 05:39 PM |