![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With all of the pieces of the puzzle, and very little motive from the seller, I am thinking PSA got this one right.
A question though, does anyone have another T207 with print that looks like that? They should be out there somewhere, no?
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are a few Lewis no emblems(actually a large percentage of the ones known). All are less sharp than the emblem counterpart.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the one from the find has lost most or all of it's glossy coating, probably from decades of storage in a humid or damp environment and may have other environmental damage as well, fly specking, etc.
Last edited by sb1; 10-28-2020 at 11:58 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The font on the name sure is weird, but the back looks perfectly normal. For there to be funny business going on, it would have to be a reback using an already expensive card, then the doctor would have to risk sticking it to a sheet and risk soaking it. Very unlikely imo.
Also, cool to see the full sheet of cards. I own 9 of these and didn't know they all came from the same place.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm trying to think of how that would happen.
The closest I can get is maybe overinking along with too much water on the plate. There's a similar common problem on an engraved stamp, but it was because of a change in both the pigment and the type of press all at once, and was from almost 40 years earlier. By the time T207s were a thing it had totally been sorted out and as far as I know wasn't ever a problem on lithographed items. The idea that the glosscoat has been affected a lot might work too. If the gloss was printed on top of a still damp (ish) black, they might have combined and drifted as the gloss was affected, or the black slightly migrated into the gloss. Overall a very strange outlier. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Curious if any of the recent winners of the raw cards would post their perceptions of the card(s) when they get them in hand. I got Gregg (two right, one down from the Lewis being discussed) and am curious to know what others think about their card.
Thanks -- Mike.
__________________
T207's - Sale/Trade T207 Napoleon HOF subset - in-progress (10/13) . T207 Master - in-progress (675/704 - 96%) . T207 Magic Numbers: 7/19/2 | 5/1/1 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something else I found interesting about the raw cards...
All of the cards were either Broadleaf factory 25 or Anonymous factory 25 from what I could tell, unless I missed some. It looks like a pretty original grouping. I don't think it would be a wild stretch to say that these were likely put together a long time ago. Is there not some debate on what packs the Anonymous factory 25 cards were inserted into? I think this is a really good clue that they were in Broadleaf packs. They either didn't have the logo at first or it was removed for some reason. Why would the old timer that was ripping down the smokes be smoking all kinds of brands? Any thoughts on this from the T207 gurus? Last edited by oldeboo; 10-29-2020 at 07:45 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: T207 Irv Lewis | obcmac | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 05-16-2019 07:12 PM |
WTB: T207 Duffy Lewis | GoSoxBoSox | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-19-2011 07:41 AM |
T207 Irv Lewis wanted.. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-19-2005 11:08 AM |
T207 Irv Lewis | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-24-2004 04:09 PM |
t207 Lewis | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-29-2002 10:09 PM |