 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-29-2020, 12:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Bob. I'm interested get opinions on how people think that card would grade as it sits. I'm not a grading junkie (and my opportunity to get things graded from the UK is pretty limited) but I'd like to have the benchmark.
I think the card might have been a NM 7 without the damage. Could anyone with experience of these things offer an idea of how the damage would affect the grade?
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1952 Star-Cal, 1954B, 1955B, 1969T Super, 1971T and 1972T 
|
|
#2
10-29-2020, 01:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Being off center on the front and with back damage, I would say it would grade PSA 2 (Good). Without the back damage, I think the centering would nevertheless keep it from being as high as a 7. Just my opinion.
|
|
#3
10-29-2020, 04:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would have said closer to 3, with a slight possibility higher.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#4
10-30-2020, 10:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
3-4, unless they overlook it - in which case it might be a 5 or higher. Nice card either way!
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-30-2020 at 10:56 AM.
|
|
#5
10-30-2020, 05:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I live by this maxim, because it's the nature of the beast: Whatever you truly think it will grade at, subtract 2, and you will still be off by a minimum of one or two grades.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Slab damage? | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 10-05-2020 03:47 PM |
| Anyone ever have PSA damage a card on review? | KingFisk | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-13-2018 02:06 PM |
| SGC and Back Damage? | timelord | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-22-2011 11:41 AM |
| D304 Cobb with back damage on ebay -- back damage not shown | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-26-2010 06:51 PM |
| T206 question: How does back damage affect grade and value? | Luke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-13-2010 10:42 AM |
Hybrid Mode
