![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you look at the last two images I posted, those are the semi-high sheets, going up to #656 Rudy May.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was thinking of the reverses but I missed your images the first time. Checklists are never consistent with Topps, I suspect they got glossed over a little in proofreading.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is still possible that the 6th checklist, printed in the 5th printing run, had the copyright placed differently than the one printed in the 6th print run. Can't tell unless we see the back of that sheet which was posted.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here's what we still need to know... • Were only left-side checklists printed on the high number sheets, and only right-side checklists printed on the semi-high number sheets? • Were both left-side and right-side versions of the checklist printed on the high number sheets? • Were both left-side and right-side versions of the checklist printed on the semi-high number sheets? • Were both left-side and right-side versions of the checklist printed on only one of the sheets (semi-high or high) but NOT on the other?
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not on subject per se, but I'm not able to see the images which are posted in this thread (yes, I'm logged in). It shows a little image of what looks like a torn photo with a alpha-numeric description of the image, but no image. Images are coming through clearly on other threads. Help? Would really love to be able to see these pics.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very interesting. I'm slowly doing the '72 set. Don't have a ton of high numbers yet, though I have one hell of a nice Hoyt Wilhelm.
![]()
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I might ask about High Numbers in general, were they really produced in smaller quantities or harder to obtain? or is it a myth that gives fodder to people who want to sell them for more than Lower Numbers?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1972 Topps High Number Lot of 8 EX $30.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 09-26-2019 09:09 AM |
1972 Topps high number lot (19) high grade, ends 5/29 | RedlegsFan | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 8 | 05-29-2017 09:54 AM |
***ENDS TONIGHT*** 1972 Topps High Number Lot of 16 different | vintagetoppsguy | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 11 | 09-24-2015 07:54 PM |
1972 topps high number lot of 16 different | vintagetoppsguy | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 3 | 07-28-2015 07:03 AM |
WTB/WTT: High number 1972 Topps | Jaybird | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-19-2010 08:45 PM |