|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would not say it does not make a difference, I would just say who are we to decide one hundred years later that 1912 is fine and 1913 is not. Or 1919 is great but 1925 is not. In a perfect world where people are generally educated on what they are buying, I believe a photographers work should stand on its own, then a period of production should be listed (c. 1910), then the buyers should really decide. A 1910 print of the Cobb should be more valuable than a 1915 print, but this would play out in the market with all information available to the buyers, both however are Conlon's original work.
I have actually toyed with the idea when I sell photos of just having a small checklist. Off original Negative Yes/No Known Photographer Yes/No Paper Type __________ Date of Creation __________ Date of Production _________ That would give you all the information you would need to know. Granted, a "Type 1" PSA designation checks off most of those boxes without saying a single extra word, it is easy to understand, and that is why people like it.
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, as to the post Andrew made of the side by side Conlons, the paper used and method of production has more to do with what the naked eye perceives than you would think. Some really blurry images are off the original negative and some crystal clear images are sometimes not. Conlon had a more washed out look in his production during the WWI era through the early 1920's. I have never been a fan of that era. I have no idea why he used this method, someday when I am dead too I have a mental note to ask him, but Conlon was a rock star who went through a "Spaghetti Incident" phase for a time and many of his images are pretty blurry for a fairly substantial period of time. Perhaps the Sporting News and baseball guide books (his biggest clients) preferred these?
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Cobb Reprint on ebay... buyer beware | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-04-2020 03:34 PM |
| SOLD: Ty Cobb Type 1 Sliding photo - 1912 | Runscott | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 4 | 02-05-2015 02:13 PM |
| T206 fake cobb on ebay-buyer beware !!! | JohnP0621 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-29-2014 07:56 AM |
| Wow...Buyer beware !! | T206DK | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-25-2010 03:14 PM |
| buyer beware | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-15-2003 07:35 AM |