|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly to my point. PSA themselves does this too.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly, if PSA does it, it has to be OK.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
My point is simply that if I do something to a card which literally leaves no trace that a PSA or SGC can detect, I don't see how that's a problem. It's basically handling the card. I'm not using a marker or a brush or an exacto knife to do something to the corner to alter its original state. I won't go so far as to get into a "Conservation" argument like PWCC did, but issues resulting from handling of cards are something that TPG's should be able to detect. My aim with flipping a corner is not to try to improve a grade, or indeed to try to get any certain grade.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 02-23-2021 at 09:21 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The problem is that pretty much anything gets by PSA and SGC and Beckett.
PSA has so many that got by that should have been obvious that I have to think they either just can't spot even passably competent alterations, or are part of the problem. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe if you are PWCC or Probstein anything gets by? I know way too many average Joe collectors who routinely get stuff rejected as altered or slabbed "AA" by PSA.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 02-23-2021 at 11:36 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
to see % of cards getting numeric grades vs rejected as well as percentages of numeric grade distribution reported by submitter for the top 50 (by dollar volume) vs. a random sampling of 50 other submitters. Oh sorry, daydreaming for a second.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And if as you think it's "only" PWCC or Probstein, that would mean PSA and at least SGC are complicit. Not exactly a positive thing. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
My point was simply that cards are rejected, and labeled "altered" regularly. Are things "getting by" and receiving number grades too? Probably, I don't know. If that is the case I'm sure it is indeed more than just two large well known dealers.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA fixing mistakes | Bestdj777 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 07-01-2017 08:13 PM |
| Any advice on fixing sleep schedule? | Sean1125 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 6 | 07-29-2013 02:28 AM |
| fixing scratched slabs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-04-2008 09:24 AM |
| fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 06:17 PM |
| Help Needed fixing links | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-09-2003 08:36 PM |