Should be interesting CSG 52 Topps Mays

[Rich Klein]

Originally Posted by Casey2296

So much wrong here. CSG has clearly shown they have no interest in grading pre 70's cards, why would anyone sub a card like a 52 Mays to them.

Then why would CSG hire Andy Broome, who was the leading vintage grader at Beckett? That comment makes little sense.

Rich

[sflayank]

Card is a poor 1

[conor912]

I still can’t believe they went with all that blank space on the flip. I realize it’s for subgrades, which is what goes in that space if you want to pony up for them, but I could pen a short story on all that blank white. I can’t think of another word more fitting for the overall eye appeal of that card in that case with that grade than “laughable”.

[ullmandds]

terrible looking flip...looks very unprofessional...and def overgraded.

Yuk!

Seeing as the flips have become the investment...they may be in trouble!!!

[bks14sr]

This is pretty disappointing seeing this bad of an over grade from them. It immediately discredits them in my mind. I’m still hoping they gain traction relative to other tpg’s, but they need to re-evaluate some things.

[buymycards]

The seller has 11 CSG slabs for sale. One of them is a 1997 Press Pass Tim Duncan rookie, with a checklist on the back, that lists for $1.00 in the Beckett Basketball card price guide.

The bottom right edge looks pretty bad for an 8.5 graded card.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by bks14sr

This is pretty disappointing seeing this bad of an over grade from them. It immediately discredits them in my mind. I’m still hoping they gain traction relative to other tpg’s, but they need to re-evaluate some things.

Agreed. Off to a terrible start. Vintage cards is obviously not their forte.

[BobbyVCP]

There is no look of a legitimate grading company...they look more like the scam graders.

[buymycards]

From their website:

2.5 A card graded Good Plus may have heavier creasing, but the creasing does not travel across the surface from edge to edge. The card may also have some surface damage such as one small writing mark on the back. An extremely heavy diamond cut resulting in a near miscut is allowed.

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

Then why would CSG hire Andy Broome, who was the leading vintage grader at Beckett? That comment makes little sense.

Rich

Great question Rich and one I've been wondering about myself. Why would a company with substantial resources like CSG not take the time to engage focus/marketing/design groups on what is important to vintage collectors if one of their goals was the vintage card market? Hell, they could have flown Leon and a few others out for a nice weekend chat at a swanky resort and had their answer. Which would have been:

"For decades, vintage collectors have been saying they love the thin PSA flip and the SGC black apron, combine those two with honest grading and good customer service and the world is your oyster".

Look at the majority of comments on any CSG thread here from the beginning, "Great flip for modern but overwhelming for vintage". Lime green label the size of a T206? Who made that decision? I'm sure it wasn't Andy but somebody over there did. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to wonder why AH's scan their vintage cards with a black background, it looks better and aesthetics are important, they always have been. And to the minority of vintage collectors that say they don't care what the flip looks like? Well here's what you get, the abomination posted in this thread.

And while I have the utmost respect for Andy and what seems like some good grading technology from CSG, and I'm sure they'll do well in the modern market, their design/marketing teams failed miserably when it comes to vintage collectors. To put so much effort into hiring one of, if not the top notch vintage graders out there and to completely ignore the vintage market is befuddling to me. That flip is designed for the modern market not the vintage market.

So the only conclusion I can surmise is that they have no interest in catering to the vintage collector, and that's okay, just don't piss on my head and tell me it's raining. My two cent opinion.

[RL]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

Then why would CSG hire Andy Broome, who was the leading vintage grader at Beckett? That comment makes little sense.

Rich

they made an error hiring that guy. and hiring him makes no sense.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by RL

they made an error hiring that guy. and hiring him makes no sense.

I disagree. IMO he is the best grader in the industry at detecting fakes and fraudulent cards. I agree that they need to tighten their grading standards to stay competitive. But then again I have know him for over 20 yrs so I am a little biased. I also know some of the other graders in the hobby and to me he is the best one out there right now.

.

[RL]

Originally Posted by Leon

I disagree. IMO he is the best grader in the industry at detecting fakes and fraudulent cards. I agree that they need to tighten their grading standards to stay competitive. But then again I have know him for over 20 yrs so I am a little biased. I also know some of the other graders in the hobby and to me he is the best one out there right now.

.

Leon, I do value your opinion, especially on vintage cards.

[marzoumanian]

I subscribe to Beckett Vintage Collector and when Andy was with that organization he regularly wrote detailed articles about how to detect fraud in vintage cards of ALL sorts. The hobby needs this man of integrity. Don't jump to conclusions so quickly. Peace and stay healthy.

[nolemmings]

I really dislike the gargantuan label, it should be half that height. Slab labels should be like umpires--best appreciated when hardly noticed. And stuff the subgrades on the back--they're obtrusive anyway. Subgrades are useful, at most IMO, to account for surface problems not readily seen from scans.

As for the grade of this card, meh. Probably more accurately a 1.5, but it's hard for me to get worked up about a card this low on the grading scale. The eye appeal or lack of same should drive the price at the good or so level. It's not like someone would be looking to pump up their registry status (assuming this were a PSA card for example). Nor would someone likely spend a bunch of time or money trying to "improve" their set with this card because of its slabbed grade. Is the market at the very low grade level really slab-number driven anyway?

[chadeast]

Originally Posted by nolemmings

As for the grade of this card, meh. Probably more accurately a 1.5, but it's hard for me to get worked up about a card this low on the grading scale. The eye appeal or lack of same should drive the price at the good or so level. It's not like someone would be looking to pump up their registry status (assuming this were a PSA card for example). Nor would someone likely spend a bunch of time or money trying to "improve" their set with this card because of its slabbed grade. Is the market at the very low grade level really slab-number driven anyway?

I would say no, or at least less driven by the flip than higher grade vintage and modern for sure. Eye appeal is king for low grade vintage, in my recent experience as a buyer. The problem is that this card doesn't have much eye appeal for a 2.5. It might be considered a decent 1, but it just looks silly with a VG+ grade. Having the silly slab on top of that is insult to injury. If and when it is sold for a reasonable price, my guess is that the buyer will crack it out immediately. Hard to imagine any collector of low grade vintage keeping it in that! I certainly wouldn't.

[cesarcap]

Pulling for one of these new grading companies to push the established ones but I wouldn't pay > than a 1 SGC/PSA for this Mays.

[nolemmings]

Originally Posted by chadeast

I would say no, or at least less driven by the flip than higher grade vintage and modern for sure. Eye appeal is king for low grade vintage, in my recent experience as a buyer. The problem is that this card doesn't have much eye appeal for a 2.5. It might be considered a decent 1, but it just looks silly with a VG+ grade. Having the silly slab on top of that is insult to injury. If and when it is sold for a reasonable price, my guess is that the buyer will crack it out immediately. Hard to imagine any collector of low grade vintage keeping it in that! I certainly wouldn't.

The card has gd+ grade, not vg+. As for cracking it out, different strokes I guess. I didn't know low grade collectors gave much of a crap about the slabs anyway, and would be as likely to crack it out if was in a PSA holder regardless of the number. Keep it in the PSA holder if "properly" graded a 1 but crack it out if it's overgraded as a 2.5? OK.