SGC Grading - 1963 Topps Aaron

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by Tere1071

This is a problem with many cards that appear on eBay. When I scroll through and see a card described as "excellent," which is the condition I try to collect I find cards with rounded corners, creases, and other forms of damage which is annoying. Even on the collector forums collectors complain if their card gets a desired grade. So, I wonder if it is due to knowing how to accurately grade a card, wishful thinking, trying to get a top price or a combination of all of these factors.

Phil, I like to think of it as there are a lot of optimistic graders in this world.

[tjenkins]

Personally, I think you got a break with a 2.5. That card is one I absolutely would not want but thats just me.

[carlsonjok]

Originally Posted by tjenkins

Personally, I think you got a break with a 2.5. That card is one I absolutely would not want but thats just me.

I am quite happy with it, but some of us have to limit ourselves to the shallow end of the hobby pool.

[todeen]

Originally Posted by carlsonjok

I am quite happy with it, but some of us have to limit ourselves to the shallow end of the hobby pool.

Aside from my joke earlier, I would be happy with it too! Cards that have imperfections don't really bother me, especially imperfections that are only visible when light reflects off of them at a certain angle. For only $15, it's a card worth having. Congrats.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[jchcollins]

I would say that is accurately graded based on the surface. Remember, technical grade does not equal eye appeal. This card is a prime example of that.

[Tere1071]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

Phil, I like to think of it as there are a lot of optimistic graders in this world.

Optimistic or delusional? It's a fine line.