|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree w/ you--The corners & edges are very sharp and there are no stray print marks--the only thing I see is the OC, which is the basis of my comment about centering. I feel as though it should have graded just a tad higher.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fred, I suggest you contact CSG and ask them how much the reduced the grade on your lovely Aaron card for the relatively-poor centering. And, if you kindly let us know CSG's answer, this will give all of us a good idea as to what to expect when we submit.
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad & blank backs. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking cards of WaJo. Also E222 A.W.H. Caramel cards of Revelle & Ryan. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hate to be "that guy" but if you look at the back scan there is a ding in the top border over the L in FALSE, possibly some damage on the bottom border under the home run total, tiny corner touches and pretty noticeable toning. While I think it's an awesome 6, I think the grade is right.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 03-26-2021 at 07:58 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
that is a sweet Aaron...
The way centering works for the technical grade, the card has to meet a specific requirement, (with some leeway I'd assume). A CSG 7 has to be 70/30 or better. A CSG 6 has to be 75/25 or better. I am guessing the tools came up with something like this.... I zoomed in /out on the screen a few times and measured... I got slightly better than ~80/20 every time. I think it is too far from 70/30 to get a 7... corners/edges/surface have way more subjectivity because the grader is applying his opinion to a description.
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey Collecting: T206 Monster #236 |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree 100 percent with it. You're hired!
Now, when can you start?!? Peace. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Being the Centering OCD kinda guy that I am - I had to take a measure on this one -
I have always personally used the JRuler Utility to measure borders in Pixels. On your Aaron - I come up with Left = 22 Pixels Right = 19 Pixels Centering L to R = 53.6/46.4 Top = 29 Pixels Bottom = 9 Pixels Centering T to B = 76.3/23.7 So if my measurements are correct then the T/B Centering would be just a tad bit under what their stated requirements are for a 6 Still a great card but I would really question them if it was in a 7 holder Quote:
__________________
My Monster Progess Complete Set......: 238 / 520 : 45% HOF Cards..........: 009 / 076 : 12% Southern League.: 000 / 048 : 00% Minor League......: 055 / 086 : 41% Portrait Cards......: 077 / 180 : 43% Horizontal Cards.: 000 / 006 : 00% |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
After reading everyone's comments & re-examining my card w/ a magnifier, I am changing my opinion of the grade.
Quote:
Your above comments are "right on"--you sure have an "eagle eye" for grading! There IS a minute mark over the L in False and on the bottom, under the HR total is a wee indent--my magnifier sees it as a tiny "rubber band" indent! (I now remember noticing this when I was preparing the card for submission) Bottom Line is: I now think the Grade of 6 is very fair & accurate! Thank You ALL for the comments--they have all been well thought out & most of all, VERY correct!!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() These are on their way back from CSG. I think the grades were accurate and I am pleased with the way they look. As for flip size, I do not mind the 'older guy' big fonts. I am an older guy...
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 03-27-2021 at 11:55 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1961 Topps high-series 33 card lot and 8 card lot...**lots moved to Ebay** | 1966CUDA | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 11 | 03-11-2020 08:26 PM |
| Can Not find a comp for this card anywhere. | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-31-2018 08:27 PM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 01:52 PM |
| raw card grading in ebay listings | keating3620 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-25-2011 08:24 PM |
| gma grading / wagner card on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-19-2007 10:11 PM |