|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm not sure what the state of the art is for coins , but they seem to have tightened up a lot on things that were common, like nearly 100% of shiny silver coins being technically cleaned. With Stamps, the major expertizing groups have added grading, which is almost entirely based on centering. I've met a couple people who do expertizing, and the depth of knowledge is amazing. But they also tend to only work in a fairly narrow field, like US between 1873 and 1890. Not that they don;t know a LOT about all the other areas, and even about many foreign stamps, but their primary area they get paid to work with is just that. (Some may work more generally, most of the information applies across many areas) The first step for them is "is it a genuine stamp" followed by "which exact stamp is it?" any major flaws will allow a certificate saying it's real, but with noted flaws but no grade. They take their time, and apparently do compare notes between three different expertizers. Very little of that is done with scientific equipment, but there are groups working that way. They just don't do expertizing (although members might) They also take their time. I had a couple stamps looked at during a "what's my stamp worth" type event at the international show in 2006. The explaining how to tell what they were took him longer than the identifying, which took literally a few seconds. (I like done, had doubts about the other, and was pretty pleased to be right about both ) I've also sent in a couple, and the companies take their time so they get it right. One was probably easy, as it was one of the ones I took to the international, the other was a new discovery of a major variety, and the first of its kind expertized. Unlike PSA, they are totally ok with things that aren't cataloged yet in fact, getting a certificate may be necessary to get it cataloged. I included a copy of an article describing the variety, which probably helped. I haven't bought a new catalog in years, so I don't know if it ever got listed, or if I'd have to push a bit for a listing. (I had another discovery that was picked up on by a second tier catalog and listed. ) It's certainly possible to detect pretty much any alteration. But it does require knowing something about the item, and actually looking. Something the graders appear to actively avoid. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the response Steve. What you describe appears to be materially different from PSA's business model, which is based on volume. I agree that many alterations that get by are detectable without scientific means, if graders took the time and had the expertise in the myriad of different card issues to detect alterations. But they don't, and the fact that PSA is for the time being not accepting new submissions until they clear up the backlog hardly gives one confidence this business model will be changing anytime soon.
And that is why the grading market is wide open IMO for a new type of company, one that should it come into being I simply don't see how in time cannot make obsolete the current model of grading. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I wasn't hopelessly disorganized, I'd have given it a try a few years ago.
But I know that if I did I'd have a backlog with just a few cards, mostly because I'd get distracted to other stuff. I'd also be more like the stamp places. A certificate with photo and a description of the flaws. I've tried to figure out how to have a slab that has a place to put an accompanying certificate, but I haven't really found anything that I think would work. The closest I can get would be a sealed mylar holder a bit like a book, card sealed into one side, the cert in a pocket on the other. Building out what people would probably want, a serious web site, with a database and high res scans and a workable registry would be way beyond what I could do. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
How about a QR code on the back of the label. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also prefer a hard copy cert, like this one. It clearly lets anyone know what they're getting. A genuine stamp with a particular variety, and a faked cancel. The large red stamp calling particular attention to an alteration is a fairly recent thing, and a good idea. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dean's Cards - Deja Vu All Over Again | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 11-20-2018 06:58 PM |
| Deja Vu All Over Again | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-14-2017 09:57 AM |
| Déjà Vu All Over Again | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 09-12-2015 10:13 AM |
| It's deja vu all over again........ | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-13-2014 09:45 AM |
| Recolored Card | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-14-2012 02:33 PM |