|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just assume if the card is a PSA 4 or less, it will likely have some degree of creases. If I want to ensure it doesn't, I buy a 5+.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The PSA 4 qualification runs the gamut. I've seen PSA 4 cards with wrinkles, rounded corners, or with a minor crease, but my Mantle and Snider are both PSA 4. Neither one has any creasing or wrinkles, plus the corners are decent. My Mantle is centered 30/70 from top to bottom and the Snider has a wax stain on the back, maybe that accounts for the vg/ex grade. I also added my SGC 4.5 Musial, which has a dinged corner at the bottom left. I suppose I wished that I had the money at the time for cards that were excellent to excellent mint, but I don't think that I did too badly.
Last edited by Tere1071; 05-17-2021 at 06:27 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Glad I am not the only collector who subscribes to this exceedingly simple concept....
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a handful of PSA 4's. None have creases. Registration and centering are easier to see in pictures than creases.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wish PSA, SGC, and Beckett had grader's notes.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (137/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (200/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have seen PSA 7s and even 8s that have tiny wrinkles. It's very difficult for a card to have true surface integrity, especially it seems when it comes to cards from the 1970s.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
True. Common wisdom says that 5’s will not have creases or wrinkles on the front, but that’s not always the case. I once had a ‘55 Bowman Kaline that looked like an 8 from an arm’s length; razor sharp corners - but the front had some light, but rather large for what it was - wrinkling. It was graded a PSA 5. I think that’s pretty misleading. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-20-2021 at 08:20 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 06:02 PM |
| Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 12:38 PM |
| (ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 06:30 PM |
| PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 07:04 PM |
| How is T206 not an MC Qualifier? | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-10-2010 12:28 PM |