|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about years with none? 1953, right? And only one from 1956 and 1958 and 1959 (counting only players not managers). 1950, none also I think.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-15-2021 at 04:06 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No rookies in 1955 Bowman either are there?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
No but I was thinking in terms of years not sets.
Also none in 1970. 1985?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-15-2021 at 04:14 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
1988 weighs in with 5: Alomar, Biggio, Glavine, Smoltz, and E. Martinez.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
1985 has Kirby Puckett.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, 1984 has Kirby Puckett. I don't buy that XRC nonsense Jim Beckett came up with. IMO, his only RC is 1984 Fleer Update.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-16-2021 at 10:40 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Who is your rookie in 1986? Agree to disagree on Puckett. It was the hobby and collectors not Beckett who decided that rookie cards had to be available to the majority of collectors and not regionals or limited releases like 1984 Fleer Update.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're right, no 1986 either, although I suspect McGriff and/or Bonds eventually will make it.
I just don't see how you can call a 1985 Puckett a rookie when he has a nationally distributed card from a top three brand in 1984, but whatever.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
So why is 1992 Topps Traded Garciaparra indisputably his rookie card? And 1991 Topps Traded Bagwell and I Rod? And the 1989 Griffey traded and update cards? And the 1988 Alomar and Biggio traded and update cards? The only difference I see is that Beckett dropped the XRC after 1987.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-17-2021 at 01:18 PM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Unless Beckett asked every collector, then it is Beckett who made the final determination. That premise established by Beckett is slowly being chipped away. 1984 Fleer Update Roger Clemens and Kirby Puckett are their rookie cards and are far more desirable cards than any of their 1985 cards. The fact they were harder to obtain makes it even appealing...not worse. As long as they are baseball cards, and not photos or something, how they were distributed (widespread or not) is meaning less and less in the eyes of many collectors. At this point, I prefer the regional and/or tougher issued cards. The 'traditional' counterparts get a little boring since there are so many of them in circulation. The 'true rookie card' has always been a moving target and viewed differently by everyone and is a contrived notion much like the Holiday of Sweetest Day is...so it doesn't really matter at that point. What it comes down to is if the 1984 Fleer Update is a better card than any of the 1985 issues. I say 100% yes they are. The fact they are more rare is a far more appealing factor than what Beckett says is a rookie card or not...but to each their own. Nobody will convince anyone who already has their mind made up on that topic anyway.
__________________
http://originaloldnewspapers.com Last edited by HistoricNewspapers; 06-18-2021 at 06:21 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() XRC is sham, 1985 Mcgwire is not an XRC and is not even a major league card... The emperor has no clothes over there in their designations. For me personally, I consider the first card issued in a major league uni the RC and agree fully that includes the Star sets, the 86' Fleer is years away from being a RC and easily the most overvalued and over hyped card in the hobby other than the 2nd year 1952 Mantle which is first place hands down. I know that not everyone has the same thoughts nor do I expect them to. These are my thoughts and beliefs and I would personally never call either a rookie.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 06-18-2021 at 05:45 PM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agreed on 101 vs 57.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Amen. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Graded Population Growth from year to year | Farm_kid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-22-2020 07:25 PM |
| 1958 LA Dodgers Year Book - First year in CA. | jerrys | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 01-13-2020 10:19 PM |
| Best Year for set collectors/ Worst year | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 03-05-2018 04:22 PM |
| Examples of HOF card earlier year cheaper than a later year card? | 1952boyntoncollector | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 7 | 07-11-2016 01:18 PM |
| HOF Best First Year/Last Year Rookie Cards Topps | jb67 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 03-28-2016 11:41 AM |