![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As much sadness as the headlines inspired, when I really consider what it means to me - I don't think this will be of huge impact. I have tried multiple times since getting back into the hobby in 2015, but I just can't get into modern. 95% of my hobby involvement right now is in the area of postwar vintage. I will admit to liking Topps Heritage, but if they don't make it all the way up to the 1980's with that run - it won't exactly be the end of the world for me.
In the interim, a lot can happen in 5 years. Fanatics might buy the name, and even if they don't, there are any number of things which conceivably happen that would mean the Topps name isn't completely dead. Any of that impacting my desire to collect modern cards one way or another just seems kind of doubtful to me right now. While I hate that it's come to this for Topps, I don't think they are 100% innocent either in terms of how the game was played and things went down, and you have to remember too that this kind of thing is not unprecedented in the hobby. There has not been a Goudey or Bowman Gum Company for quite some time. Baseball will go on, and the hobby will go on as well.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 08-23-2021 at 02:21 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nah, except that I did enjoy the Topps Now products from the Dodgers title run. But my collection basically stops after 1981, which was the last year I was collecting as a kid.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Topps is acquired by Fanatics I hope distribution is improved. The Topps site is horrible and they almost never have any products for sale on it. It seems like if hobby boxes do manage to make it to the site, they're up for an hour or two and then gone. Even when I've managed to win raffles to be included in the chance to purchase products in advance, the site is often buggy and I have a ton of problems trying to check out.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems like virtually every product launch is spoken for before it even comes out. The wholesale focus of Topps sucks and it's even worse now that Topps factors secondhand market value into their initial launch. The last Sapphire boxes retailed for over $300 I think.
Last edited by packs; 08-23-2021 at 03:49 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm so glad I grew up in the era of buying wax packs and cello packs, and didn't have to compete with adults fighting in parking lots over "product"!
Last edited by jgannon; 08-23-2021 at 05:56 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Plenty of people will want them, and I suspect they'd sell rather well IF the set were done right. You'd probably even see more growth in the hobby by drawing in more kids, who'd actually be able to find packs here and there. This would assure more long term, generational interest in the hobby in the future. What you wouldn't see is the clamoring, in-store childishness and all the "hot breaks" videos and buy-ins, along with almost instantaneous and ridiculous mark-ups for new product on the secondary market along with it's attendant impact on vintage pricing. To me, that'd be win-win. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you are one who buys into the hobby-only, super limited contrived scarcity thing - well then yeah. You might not want those cards.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Responding to this and the post above, color me skeptical that kids will ever again be into collecting pieces of cardboard with athlete photos on them simply for the sake of having them, at least on anything approaching a mass scale. That's not how 21st century kids relate to sports, or the broader world around them for that matter. I know this is not a unique view around here. Also - even if cultivating a base of youth collectors were a viable strategy, when do corporations ever focus on long-term sustainable development over short-term windfalls these days? |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Payment Plans For Cards? | Seven | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-29-2020 09:35 AM |
Changing collecting habits or thinking about getting out altogether? | Throttlesteer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 06-21-2019 08:44 AM |
Is anyone else changing their collecting habits? | JustinD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 07-03-2016 10:55 AM |
Change of plans... WTB 52-56 Topps and Bowman lots VGEX or better | mid50sbaseball | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2016 08:25 PM |
Any plans for an Old Judge Book? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-22-2006 07:17 PM |