![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The baggie is a slight eyesore, but it also protects it from edge and other wear while inside the slab. PSA cards routinely (and some SGC cards) get edge wear due to the prongs or cutout.
Pictures are too far away to give a solid prospective grade.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Heresy to say so on this board but I have always hated the "gaskets" SGC uses.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Really? I kind of prefer the SGC look… not a fam of BVG (even if they did not have the shiny baggy)
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not I. Really cheap quality acrylic, any holder that isn't very recent is inevitably scratched and scuffed and worst of all they don't really clean up with polish unlike PSA. Gaskets that people have said cause damage to cards if too snug a fit. Mediocre flips. None of that detracts from the quality of the grading, of course, just IMO a poor presentation.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
![]() |
|
|