![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The green screen went over the sheet when it was an inch out of alignment. The words at top are actually from the bottom of the card above it. Cool find, though is it just a bad registration issue.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good one Joe
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't remember if this one has been mentioned here or not, Topps replaced Ed Bouchee with a second Jim Bunning on the 1958 Second Series sheet creating a double print of Bunning, making a photo cropping variation similar to the eleven double printed cards in the 1963 Topps Fifth Series sheet. The pinstripe hits the Tigers emblem in the center of the circle and the T on his uniform is cut off at the end on one version, the second version has the pinstripe more to the left hitting the Tigers emblem circle and the end of the T on his uniform is visible.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Either you or someone else told me about this one because I have both.
Still looking and hoping for a pulled Bouche proof ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not in the same League as Joe's above but maybe an honorable mention
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Each of these three versions: no blob, small blob, larger blob, are fairly common. Malzone was double-printed, but I don't know why there would be three versions (and maybe more).
https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1632360416 Always looking for 1956 salesman samples, miscuts, sheet cuts, printer's defects, panels, overprints and other errors. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My group of Malzones. Blob at top. Then faded blob. Then no blob. But my no blob seems to have another defect. It is not a crease but maybe an after production mark rather than a printing defect
![]() ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |