|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
B
The 53 Mantle is my favorite Mantle card, the 52 doesn't really do anything for me. I'd also like to trade all the other Mantles for a 51B. So I'd be happy with my Mantle collection to stand at 2. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
If we're talking personal collection, the latter. I'm not really a fan of the 1952 card. But for investment purposes, I'd take the 52T over the field.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
B.
I have such a small collection, the quantity add appeals to me. and With A, if you needed to liquidate, you'd have to do it all at once. With B, you could trade or sell off some according to need or opportunity. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
That’s how I’m thinking in terms of liquidating. More People can come up with $7,000 for a card apposed to $175,00 for one card.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
52 Topps
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
52 Topps and it isn’t close. It is the superstar of post war cards.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Honestly, I find the '52 and the '53 Mantles hideous. I cannot understand the dollars thrown at either one, frankly. Both are amateurish and cartoonish, IMO. There are WAY better looking cards in both sets. Up until recently I had three 1960 Topps Mantles in near-mint condition. I traded one, and gave one to my daughter. I kept what I consider to be the best of the three. Personally I feel this is The Mick's best looking card.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
52 Topps
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by rats60; 09-26-2021 at 09:40 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've always liked the photography from that year (and 1957 too). I think Topps lost something when they switched away from Flexichrome.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you really think you'd have any trouble at all selling a 52T Mantle if the need arose? You might not be able to sell it tomorrow but you certainly would never have trouble selling it.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't collect 1952 Topps, but I have dabbled in some of the other sets, so I would go for option 2.
Brian (obviously a collector at heart) |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two Centered Graded Mantles, '59 #461 BT & '60 Mantle/Boyer $108 | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-11-2015 10:21 PM |
| WTT or FS Mantles for Mantle 52 Topps | jjcollects | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-17-2015 06:44 PM |
| trade 52/54 MANTLES for 51 MANTLE(R) | peachlander | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-15-2013 12:40 PM |
| trade 4 cards some mantles for a 57 mantle | joepa | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-25-2013 12:01 PM |
| PSA 7 '52 Mantle, other Mantles in PSA 8 & 9, and many other high-grade bems | joshn | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-02-2011 12:54 PM |