What Would You Rather Have Mantle or Mantles? - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2021, 02:53 PM
Republicaninmass Republicaninmass is offline
T3d $h3rm@n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabe View Post
Definitely the 52 Topps.

I second that.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" ©

Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2021, 03:00 PM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is online now
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,608
Default

B
The 53 Mantle is my favorite Mantle card, the 52 doesn't really do anything for me. I'd also like to trade all the other Mantles for a 51B. So I'd be happy with my Mantle collection to stand at 2.
__________________
Phil Lewis


https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2021, 03:05 PM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Yokosuka, Japan
Posts: 1,882
Default

If we're talking personal collection, the latter. I'm not really a fan of the 1952 card. But for investment purposes, I'd take the 52T over the field.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2021, 03:10 PM
abothebear abothebear is offline
George E.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 646
Default

B.

I have such a small collection, the quantity add appeals to me.

and

With A, if you needed to liquidate, you'd have to do it all at once. With B, you could trade or sell off some according to need or opportunity.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2021, 03:38 PM
Johnny630 Johnny630 is offline
Johnny MaZilli
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abothebear View Post
B.

I have such a small collection, the quantity add appeals to me.

and

With A, if you needed to liquidate, you'd have to do it all at once. With B, you could trade or sell off some according to need or opportunity.
That’s how I’m thinking in terms of liquidating. More People can come up with $7,000 for a card apposed to $175,00 for one card.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:09 PM
Snowman Snowman is offline
Travis
Tra,vis Tr,ail - Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 2,446
Default

52 Topps
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:27 PM
parkplace33 parkplace33 is offline
Drew W@i$e
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,656
Default

52 Topps and it isn’t close. It is the superstar of post war cards.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:27 PM
jingram058's Avatar
jingram058 jingram058 is offline
J@mes In.gram
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Pleasure planet Risa
Posts: 2,698
Default

Honestly, I find the '52 and the '53 Mantles hideous. I cannot understand the dollars thrown at either one, frankly. Both are amateurish and cartoonish, IMO. There are WAY better looking cards in both sets. Up until recently I had three 1960 Topps Mantles in near-mint condition. I traded one, and gave one to my daughter. I kept what I consider to be the best of the three. Personally I feel this is The Mick's best looking card.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1960 Mantle Front.jpg (46.9 KB, 610 views)
File Type: jpg 1960 Mantle Back.jpg (48.1 KB, 606 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:32 PM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,064
Default

52 Topps
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose
1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards
Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:41 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jingram058 View Post
Honestly, I find the '52 and the '53 Mantles hideous. I cannot understand the dollars thrown at either one, frankly. Both are amateurish and cartoonish, IMO. There are WAY better looking cards in both sets. Up until recently I had three 1960 Topps Mantles in near-mint condition. I traded one, and gave one to my daughter. I kept what I consider to be the best of the three. Personally I feel this is The Mick's best looking card.
+1. Give me the 1951:Bowman, 1952:Bowman and 1953 Bowman and fill it out with later cards. I would rather have Mantle's rookie card than his ugliest card.



Last edited by rats60; 09-26-2021 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-26-2021, 04:50 PM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Yokosuka, Japan
Posts: 1,882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jingram058 View Post
Up until recently I had three 1960 Topps Mantles in near-mint condition. I traded one, and gave one to my daughter. I kept what I consider to be the best of the three. Personally I feel this is The Mick's best looking card.
I've always liked the photography from that year (and 1957 too). I think Topps lost something when they switched away from Flexichrome.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-27-2021, 02:13 AM
Tabe's Avatar
Tabe Tabe is offline
Chris
Chr.is Ta.bar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jingram058 View Post
Honestly, I find the '52 and the '53 Mantles hideous. I cannot understand the dollars thrown at either one, frankly. Both are amateurish and cartoonish, IMO. There are WAY better looking cards in both sets. Up until recently I had three 1960 Topps Mantles in near-mint condition. I traded one, and gave one to my daughter. I kept what I consider to be the best of the three. Personally I feel this is The Mick's best looking card.
Oh yeah, the 52 isn't a particularly good looking card. The 1953 and 1954 Bowman are both much nicer. But the 52 is the 52...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-27-2021, 02:10 AM
Tabe's Avatar
Tabe Tabe is offline
Chris
Chr.is Ta.bar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny630 View Post
That’s how I’m thinking in terms of liquidating. More People can come up with $7,000 for a card apposed to $175,00 for one card.
Do you really think you'd have any trouble at all selling a 52T Mantle if the need arose? You might not be able to sell it tomorrow but you certainly would never have trouble selling it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-27-2021, 02:12 AM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,784
Default

I don't collect 1952 Topps, but I have dabbled in some of the other sets, so I would go for option 2.

Brian (obviously a collector at heart)
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two Centered Graded Mantles, '59 #461 BT & '60 Mantle/Boyer $108 mintacular 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 10-11-2015 10:21 PM
WTT or FS Mantles for Mantle 52 Topps jjcollects 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 04-17-2015 06:44 PM
trade 52/54 MANTLES for 51 MANTLE(R) peachlander 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 05-15-2013 12:40 PM
trade 4 cards some mantles for a 57 mantle joepa 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 04-25-2013 12:01 PM
PSA 7 '52 Mantle, other Mantles in PSA 8 & 9, and many other high-grade bems joshn 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 05-02-2011 12:54 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.


ebay GSB