|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Here's the Wiltse Ted Wiltse PD42.jpg |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The 4th inaccuracy in T206Resource 's PIEDMONT #42 checklist is Overall (Hands at waist level). The PIEDMONT #42 sub-set is complete with exactly 72 subjects....63 from the 350/460 Series and 9 from the 460-only Series. TED Z . Last edited by tedzan; 10-01-2021 at 06:48 AM. Reason: Added information. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted I'm not sure why you're asking me about someone else's list but some research indicates the following cards in question were at some point confirmed by the following people....
Bergen (catching) Piedmont factory 42 Anonymous Ted Z Brian W Murry (portrait) Piedmont factory 42 Dave Wipple Ted Z Scot R Overall (hands at waist) Piedmont factory 42 Ted Z Scot R Chance (batting) Piedmont factory 42 Had your initials on Bill Browns super set spreadsheet |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do we have to repeat the same old stuff, over and over again ?
What you have posted are 15-year old data when Bill Brown first posted his T206 super-set spreadsheet in 2006. For the most part Bill's Excel sheet is accurate. However, a number of wrong inputs did get reported. Subsequently, as new information regarding T206 front/back patterns as a result of my theories (and other's theories), I contacted Net54er's who had inputted questionable front/back combos on the spreadsheet. Starting with Ames (hands over head) / AB460. The guy who inputted this admitted he made a mistake. I contacted the person who provided the Overall (hands at waist level). He realized he had made a mistake, since his card was the Overall (hand at face level). Regarding Bergen.....here is my post on a thread regarding P42 cards dated: 3-16-2010 Quote:
Quote:
Furthermore, Adam Goldenberg, Craig Wright, and I were working on PIEDMONT #42 runs. The 3 of us kept in touch, trading and selling P42s to each other; and, comparing notes. I think Adam completed his run. I am not certain if Craig did. All three of us agreed that only 9 subjects in the 460-only Series were printed with P42. Several years have past since then, and NO additional new P42's have been discovered. Chase (Trophy) Latham Marquard (follow thru) Merkle (throwing) Schlei (portrait) Schlei (batting) Schaefer (Washington) Seymour (portrait) Wiltse (portrait-cap) TED Z . |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I asked you about the Tolstoi list you brought up the Ames and the Piedmont 42's. I saw your post on the Bergen from 3-16-10 but you then re-confirmed Bergen on 8-22-10. Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
This ends my discussion with you. Once again, for the umpteenth time, you have "side-tracked" the Topic of this thread.
Go play your "negative games" with some one else. This ends any further discussion with you....PERIOD ! Dated 7-9-2015..... Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted,
How have you been? Thanks for this massive contribution that you've consolidated and curated.
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Really Ted? Maybe you should pay more attention to what you post. You made the sarcastic comment. If you have a problem with the t206resource list why don't you contact Tim he's the one that makes the changes to their lists. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hi Scot The Murray and the Overall mistakes are not your fault. One of the first threads regarding PIEDMONT #42 cards dates back to December 2006. https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...3456&highlight Brian Weisner posted this list of his P#42 cards..... Hi Ted, Here is the list of my 42's: BAKERTHROW COBBBAT OFF COBBBAT OFF CRAWFORDBAT KLEINOWBOSTON KONETCHYGL LOW LATHAMPOR LATHAMNY NAT MANNINGPITCH MATHEWSONDARK MATHEWSONDCAP MCINTYREBR&CH OVERALLTHROW PELTYVERT SWEENEYTHROW SEYMOURTHROW SMITHCHI&BOS SNODGRASSCATCH WAGNERRIGHT WHITECHI However, this Overall card was inputted into the Super-Set spreadsheet as the 460-only series version of Overall (Hands at Waist). It should have been entered in as the "Hand at Face" (350/460 series) version. Your 2005 - 2006 publication of "Inside T206" inspired many of us Net54ers to seriously explore the complexities of the T206 set. Resulting in discoveries, such, as the...Elite 11.....Exclusive 12.....Mutually-Exclusive 350/460 Series.....Red-Ink Twins....etc., etc. Which provided us clearer understanding of how these cards were printed. Thereby informing us of valid T206 front/back combos. Take care my good friend, TED Z . |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
If anyone cares to understand the T206 landscape as of 2009, which is not all that dissimilar from today's landscape, see:
https://oldcardboard.com/t/t206/Insi...al-edition.pdf Some fun history, anecdotes and theories. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Consolidated access to the 15 - T206 T-brand (front/back) surveys....UPDATED | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 03-13-2015 02:44 PM |
| Red Cobb survey of all its 30 backs....post your inputs ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 176 | 07-13-2009 03:17 PM |
| A survey about more surveys | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-13-2007 02:50 PM |
| POLAR BEAR subset....need your Inputs ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 04-06-2007 07:11 PM |
| T206 Wagner-Theory | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 03-20-2007 08:33 PM |