|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The point is no one does ink analysis on these autographs.
Ink analysis would determine if the ink's age is consistent with it being from 1911, and help identify a modern fake. Normally it's time and cost-prohibitive, but this is a $1.4 million dollar autograph. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is the process in doing an ink analysis? Does a tiny portion of the signature have to be marred in order to get a sample?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I get you. Makes sense, just won't prove who signed the signature though.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are two ways to date the ink 1) Chemical analysis which does not require any ink to be removed and 2) Judging the dryness of the ink, which requires and small bit to be removed. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson Cut Signature Auto Pristineauction.com | Burrguana | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-28-2012 04:00 PM |
| Fake Shoeless Joe Sporting News | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-08-2012 10:38 PM |
| Fake Shoeless Joe - great BS story though | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-08-2011 01:16 AM |
| Fake Shoeless Joe Rookie Card? | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-16-2010 11:18 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson E90-1 on E Bay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2007 10:09 AM |