 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-07-2021, 08:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
To me, low grade is 2/3 or below. Most VG to EX-MT range is midgrade. But to the original point, there can be technically "poor" cards that have fantastic eye appeal. It's a goal of mine to seek more of these out in 2022. The market bubble on vintage may have burst, but it's not like a lot of prices are returning to their former lows.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 12-08-2021 at 05:28 AM. 
|
|
#2
12-07-2021, 12:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Several people have said low grade isn't below 6. Technically, okay I get that. But in graded cards, anything below a 6 are treated like they are low grade. Plus, I wanted to be able to include this card which I picked up cheap last year because it's "low grade".
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Low grade, high eye appeal T206 | majordanby | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-15-2015 06:42 PM |
| FS: Low grade, high eye appeal T206 | majordanby | T206 cards B/S/T | 2 | 07-07-2015 05:21 PM |
| FS: Low grade, high eye appeal T206 | majordanby | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 05-24-2015 03:18 PM |
| WTB: Low grade T206s with high eye appeal | majordanby | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 05-14-2010 11:16 AM |
Hybrid Mode
