 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21
03-12-2022, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
These are both definitely fake. These creases and wrinkles are dead giveaways. The paper loss from the crease damage is more flaky looking than aged looking. Go look at a creased mantle that's in a slab and examine the paper wear you see on it and you'll immediately see the difference. Also, look at the 51 Bowman paper stock on the back. There are two different paper stock colors on yours. You'll never see that on an original. There are many other ways to tell real from fake, but these don't even come close. Still a kind and thoughtful gesture though from your sister though
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Telling the Difference between S74-1 Silks & S74-2 Silks (Show your pics!) | npa589 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-04-2014 09:38 PM |
| Getting a football helmet signed: authentic or replica? | tjlives | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 02-28-2012 05:01 PM |
| can somebody help by telling me what this card is? | BasherBoy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 06-23-2011 10:58 PM |
| Is there a difference between a PSA 1 and PSA "authentic" | ichieh | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 05-13-2010 02:50 PM |
| An authentic replica!.... huh? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-26-2006 03:38 PM |
Threaded Mode