![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks good in the tuxedo anyway.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks amazing in the new SGC slab. Really like the miscut making it look like a 54 Topps without the top border.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys...I really do think it looks amazing in the black SGC slab and I'm not really a graded guy...guy. Never thought the of the homage to the 54 Topps...good call out!
![]() I'm going to chose to ignore the "trimming" comment as it only said "evidence" as I ditch trimmed cards, and this one is a keeper and fits the condition of my set...
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I also feel the 53 and 54 Bowman Mantles are under rated, if you can say that about a Mickey card. Clean great photos of Mick in his youth.
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had a similar experience once when attempting a crossover. I bought a 53T Satchel Paige in an SGC 4. I cracked it out (with some other key vintage cards), to send them to PSA. PSA sent it back with "evidence of trimming". Ok, so I sent it back to SGC (with the old SGC flip in the package). They slabbed it as Auth, with "Evidence of trimming"
![]() Lesson learned, there's a risk in cracking any card, because 3rd party graders are very capable of making mistakes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Much to my surprise.....M & P 302-2 | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 06-10-2008 07:23 PM |