Show...me...your print variations!

[ALR-bishop]

On the 1962 card 318 that Ben and Cliff discuss above with the missing or messed up e in New York by 1952 stats, is it two print defects, a missing e with a bad correction, or a bad e wiped out on later runs ? Anyone have one with a good e ?

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

On the 1962 card 318 that Ben and Cliff discuss above with the missing or messed up e in New York by 1952 stats, is it two print defects, a missing e with a bad correction, or a bad e wiped out on later runs ? Anyone have one with a good e ?

Strictly my opinion, but I believe it is a late run poorly done correction.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

Strictly my opinion, but I believe it is a late run poorly done correction.

It looks like that to me too. An easy correction to make poorly, just scratch the "e" into the plate and it's all fixed.

[Elberson]

I Found a weird one….1967 Topps 584 piersai…..first you have the crescent green color in the card number circle and the white touch on the outside

[G1911]

I think pretty much all the 67's can be found with this ink alignment issue. There's a ton of them.

[ALR-bishop]

Agree but when PSA recognized the 61 Fairly with a similar defect as a variation they gave hope that any defect might get recognized, even if by chance 😊

[4reals]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Agree but when PSA recognized the 61 Fairly with a similar defect as a variation they gave hope that any defect might get recognized, even if by chance

With that in mind, just found this 79 topps Dennis Lamp looking through the backs of that lot I purchased.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk